Code of Conduct
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 31 to 40 of 40
  1. #31

    Default Re: czech and speake no. 88

    Quote Originally Posted by stoneskipper
    It's been great reading everybody's impressions of this very different scent! Scentemental's excellent review really helped in deciphering this complex fragrance!

    Whenever I sample 88 I find myself agreeing with Ballardbeau that it's heavy and oppressive to an almost unbearable degree, BUT that there's also something equally compelling about it that keeps pulling me back to it.

    If fragrances can be "manic/depressive", then 88 must be number one in that category ... the bright, sunny bergamot coupled with that brooding, powdery rose is so inspired ... really a hallmark that I haven't found in any other fragrance ... perhaps it's this that I find so compelling about 88. I'm not one to often think about fragrances in terms of colors, but with 88 perhaps it's apt: the bergamot being a piercing, brilliant yellow while the rose comes across as a very muted, dusky violet.

    Interesting to read from Yvan that he finds 88 close to the skin and muted ... 88 is one that just seems to leap from the bottle and go straight for the throat (or the nostrils, whatever the case may be!) I don't get anything close to a marzipan note ...

    88 really deserves to be sampled by everyone, too bad it's so difficult to get a hold of.

    [blue]Really excellent posts everyone and a particularly excellent post Stoneskipper. I am in total agreement with all you write and especially with your last point.

    I just wanted to add an updated review of *No. 88* in which I include, among other reflections, some thoughts on the prominence and importance of the sandalwood note in this masterpiece of the perfumer's art:

    *No. 88* is Czech & Speake’s flagship scent. It’s complex, has real body, and presence, and there’s nothing else like it. It’s based on an old Elizabethan recipe that has been updated. I think it’s a benchmark scent. It has a commanding sillage like no other fragrance I know. No sillage is the wrong word. It actually creates an aura around the wearer. It reeks of elegance, quality, and assuredness.

    *No. 88* contains some of the following notes: Bergamot, Cassie, Frangipanni, Geranium, Rose Otto, Vetiver and Sandalwood. It has a soapy, floral, woodsy, slightly spicy quality to it. (As my friend Vicomte de K once astutely pointed out, Geranium in combination with Sandalwood is usually responsible for the soap note in many scents.) The floral notes are never dominatant and the cassie, which is really the essential oil from the flowers of a shrub, gives it a unique floral-spicy, balsamic note that blends elegantly with the other notes. The frangipani, like the cassie, is not your usual monochromatic floral note. It’s has a weighty floral-green aroma, with a soft spicy edge to it that again blends tightly and elgantly with the Rose Otto and sandalwood, both of which give the accord real presence and hold it together with an unmistakable aura that this is a commanding scent made unapologetically with the finest ingredients. The sandalwood is real; that is, it’s pure and natural; none of your thin, shrill, manufactured, one-dimensional simulacrum sandalwood note here; it’s weighty, full-bodied, and persistently aromatic with that slightly turpeny note of the purest and highest quality sandalwood oil that gives it an organic, almost dirty rose, non-animalic animalic woodsy and richly resinous and balsamic edge that hangs in the air like gloom. The perfumer of *No. 88*, Shirley Brody, knows what subcontinental Indians have known for thousands of years: namely, that the combination of the highest quality pure Rose Otto and pure Sandalwood oils is an elemental olfactory experience beyond compare. This is the heart of the fragrance, and there's nothing like it on the market.

    The fact that Czech & Speake *No. 88* uses 3 florals rarely found in such proportions or in such a combination in men's fragrances: Rose Otto, Frangipani, and Cassie is also a testament to its originality. Of course, all the florals are bound and integrated into the overall accord with the use of a richly resinous and balsamic sandalwood, but then so are many florals in the great women's fragrances of the past. *No. 88* has the architectonic structure of a women’s perfume, and despite its containing some floral elements, it still manages to remain a masculine scent and a very British one at that, I might add. In fact, it’s so unique; it’s such a work of art, that it goes beyond gender. Perhaps it even incorporates gender distinctions and make them irrelevant. I think of it as unisex even though it’s clearly marketed as a men’s fragrance with an aftershave in the line. In my opionion, for what it's worth, and it's one I've come to slowly, this is probably one of the five greatest scents every produced. If there was ever a "real classic", this is it.

    I wouldn't expect everyone to take to this fragrance immediately. I didn't. Like anything complex and unique, we have to come to terms such qualities. They're not always immediately palpable or even easily appreciated.

    scentemental[/blue]






  2. #32
    DustB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Washington, DC
    Posts
    9,210

    Default Re: czech and speake no. 88

    Here's a self-aggrandising post if there ever was one.

    This is a great thread on No.88--several sides, several interpretations, and several different extremely thoughtful reactions. I just can't not get involved!

    Three years ago I posted the following review on another No.88 thread, one that Ruslan started. Thanks to another member, Christian, I had a sample of No.88 and Christian and I traded messages off board about our thougths on this fragrance. On the basis of that discussion, I wrote Ruslan's thread the following review. I beg all who have read it before to forgive me.
    --Chris

    Ruslan,
    I’m glad you asked about Czech & Speake’s No.88 yesterday—it happens that Christian and I are trading messages trying to figure out this scent, what it is like, and even if we like it, on our own.

    I said it makes me feel mean because I think the scent is really austere, and has no warmth, invitation, charm, or friendliness to it. It is very distinct, and does not smell BAD at all, but it is one that I think sets a hostile aura. In that way it is a really nice piece of perfumery art. It succeeds as a decent thing to smell, but it is stripped of happy warm associations and Proustian moments.

    The scent is very dry and lemony. Very medicinal, and almost rubbing alcohol harsh. I searched Basenotes to see if I could find the year of its creation (can’t), but I would place it in a category with Aqua di Parma. No.88’s vision of what a man is and what a man should smell like is of the same genre as AdP, although the two do not smell alike. Modifications of the effervescent Eau de Cologne scents of the 19th century (I think of Guerlain’s Imperial and Eau de Cologne or Eau de Guerlain, can’t remember which it is), these scents just seek to make you smell freshly washed, well trimmed, and professionally manicured. They aren’t dandy like scents, especially not No.88. It seems to be cleanliness and a sneer in a bottle.

    Going back and forth with Christian about this, I told him I thought the scent was simply scary. Then he reminded me of how in an earlier message he had said No.88 made him think of a medieval castle fortress. I had forgotten this reference of his when I was starting to think of the scent as scary—that is an indication of how we both had similar instincts based on the scent. Christian said he thought that is probably why Ozzy wears it.

    Stoney and cold is dead on the money about this stuff, I say. It hits the nose like touching a rock in medium-to-cold weather. A rock feels colder than the air temperature because it leeches out the warmth of your fingers touching it or something, and that is how No.88 works in the nose. You get the feeling of draftiness all around you. At one point in my notes on it I said it was like smelling the vapors over a pitcher of extremely cold ice-filled ice water outside on a cold day. Sometimes wearing No.88 is like being forced to drink that pitcher all at once too.

    In contrast to other dark Goth crypt-like scents--Passage d’Enfer, Messe de Minuit (I’ve not smelled this one and thus guess at what follows), Halston 1-12--there is no burning incense or devotional candles to enliven or enchant this one. Not even the humid, vegetal, warmth of decay and closeness to the earth that seeps through stony cracks in sewers and church basements.

    I have still tried to find a note of warmth in it, a note of tenderness and hints of get-close-to-me-and-be-my-special-one in No.88, but I really can’t. I think there is a middle note of faint cinnamon which would qualify, but I often mistake ingredients in scents so it probably isn’t cinnamon. The hint is so subtle that for me it really suggests its absence instead of its presence. I truly don’t see this scent as being a sexy scent in any way shape or usage. Ain’t no cuddling going to go on on No.88’s account. Simply no way.

    Another austere scent that I had to think about while wearing No.88 around is Van Cleef & Arpels’s Tsar. Tsar is very stand alone, solid, cold like frozen metal railings in the winter that your friends tried to make you lick, but I like Tsar a lot and think it is very fun to smell. No.88 doesn’t have the same charm.

    Wearing it yesterday I put this note down, thinking of what to write to Christian:
    “Don’t see it as attractive. Not something to bring in women. Unless gangster molls, who have to flatter the macho man and have that self-imposed I’m-weak-in-the-knees-looking-at-you hired sort of look.” Instead I wrote Christian that if you’re going to wear No.88 to work you had better be the boss in the office.

    No.88 is a gunrunner’s fragrance. Underworld powerful and stereotypically powerful gentlemanly in the sense of aspirations to power without lessons in charm and charisma. There is a character in Robert Penn Warren’s book All the Kings Men, who would be wearing No.88 I think. In the story there is a pool hall owner, a rough guy who has never had an entree into society but suddenly he has to somehow make an approach to a politically active doctor and get him to stop some city action or something. The doctor lives all the graces of society and is ennobled by the depth of his education. So the pool hall owner hires a guy who hangs out smoking in his pool hall to go see the doctor. The guy he hires is a rough and tumble guy, but one who styles himself as a “gentleman,” wearing good suits, worrying about keeping the creases in his pants, and always with shiny shoes and a clean haircut. Warren even writes that the rumor was that this pool hall gentleman had his initials sewn into his silk boxer shorts. This guy is the pool hall owner’s image of a gentleman and thus he hires him to go see the doctor and bond with him gentleman-to-gentleman style. I think that is how the story went. Naturally the plan doesn’t work—the doctor throws the pool hall smoker gentleman out his door. My point is this pool hall gentleman would be wearing No.88.

    Not a favorable review, I guess. I know there are people on this forum who like No.88 a lot, including my friends Christian and John. John wrote an up-thumb review of it on its page even, saying it reminds him of lemony furniture oil. The problem for me is that I don’t think No.88 is bad, fake, or anything to regret wearing. I’ve even liked wearing it. I like it because it has the flavor of the rise of modernity for me. This is that early 20th century gentlemanly quality it has. It smells like soaps, scented powders, scented hair-tonic, scented brushes, a whole scented travel kit for the gentleman flying on the Pan Am Clipper to Asia. It reminds me of large porcelain sinks in old airport terminals—designed to be places where men would do all their toiletries during long journeys by propeller airplanes. It reminds me of hard bars of soap that crack down their length and take elbow grease to get into a lather. No.88 reminds me of pumice stones.

    In a sense this is a throwback to the Victorian era and its idea of the White Man’s burden. I took another note wearing it yesterday: “Pumice stone. Hard & cracked type of soap. What one would wear off to charm the South China Sea. Pan Am Clipper voyageurs. Dress for dinner. Conrad’s Lord Jim-esque gentlemen waited on in clubs by natives. White-man’s burden and make money by gunrunning scent. A scent for scoundrels.”

    Believe me, I keep trying to say something good about this, but the rascally images keep their grip on my brain. It was fun wearing No.88 yesterday, especially walking around thinking I was a walking pitcher of ice water—if anyone smelled me too much they would get brain freeze!

    The scent does not change much in the course of wearing it, and lasts a really healthy long time. Sorry this is such a long review filled with mixed metaphores and references! It sure has been fun to write. I thank Christian for all the fun and back and forth trying to figure this potion out.

    Regards,
    --Chris.
    That girl, that bottle, that mattress and me.

  3. #33

    Default Re: czech and speake no. 88

    Quote Originally Posted by DustB
    Here's a self-aggrandising post if there ever was one.

    This is a great thread on No.88--several sides, several interpretations, and several different extremely thoughtful reactions. *I just can't not get involved!

    Three years ago I posted the following review on another No.88 thread, one that Ruslan started. *Thanks to another member, Christian, I had a sample of No.88 and Christian and I traded messages off board about our thougths on this fragrance. *On the basis of that discussion, I wrote Ruslan's thread the following review. *I beg all who have read it before to forgive me.
    --Chris

    Ruslan,
    I’m glad you asked about Czech & Speake’s No.88 yesterday—it happens that Christian and I are trading messages trying to figure out this scent, what it is like, and even if we like it, on our own. *

    I said it makes me feel mean because I think the scent is really austere, and has no warmth, invitation, charm, or friendliness to it. *It is very distinct, and does not smell BAD at all, but it is one that I think sets a hostile aura. *In that way it is a really nice piece of perfumery art. *It succeeds as a decent thing to smell, but it is stripped of happy warm associations and Proustian moments.

    The scent is very dry and lemony. *Very medicinal, and almost rubbing alcohol harsh. *I searched Basenotes to see if I could find the year of its creation (can’t), but I would place it in a category with Aqua di Parma. *No.88’s vision of what a man is and what a man should smell like is of the same genre as AdP, although the two do not smell alike. *Modifications of the effervescent Eau de Cologne scents of the 19th century (I think of Guerlain’s Imperial and Eau de Cologne or Eau de Guerlain, can’t remember which it is), these scents just seek to make you smell freshly washed, well trimmed, and professionally manicured. *They aren’t dandy like scents, especially not No.88. *It seems to be cleanliness and a sneer in a bottle.

    Going back and forth with Christian about this, I told him I thought the scent was simply scary. *Then he reminded me of how in an earlier message he had said No.88 made him think of a medieval castle fortress. *I had forgotten this reference of his when I was starting to think of the scent as scary—that is an indication of how we both had similar instincts based on the scent. *Christian said he thought that is probably why Ozzy wears it. *

    Stoney and cold is dead on the money about this stuff, I say. *It hits the nose like touching a rock in medium-to-cold weather. *A rock feels colder than the air temperature because it leeches out the warmth of your fingers touching it or something, and that is how No.88 works in the nose. *You get the feeling of draftiness all around you. *At one point in my notes on it I said it was like smelling the vapors over a pitcher of extremely cold ice-filled ice water outside on a cold day. *Sometimes wearing No.88 is like being forced to drink that pitcher all at once too. *

    In contrast to other dark Goth crypt-like scents--Passage d’Enfer, Messe de Minuit (I’ve not smelled this one and thus guess at what follows), Halston 1-12--there is no burning incense or devotional candles to enliven or enchant this one. *Not even the humid, vegetal, warmth of decay and closeness to the earth that seeps through stony cracks in sewers and church basements.

    I have still tried to find a note of warmth in it, a note of tenderness and hints of get-close-to-me-and-be-my-special-one in No.88, but I really can’t. *I think there is a middle note of faint cinnamon which would qualify, but I often mistake ingredients in scents so it probably isn’t cinnamon. *The hint is so subtle that for me it really suggests its absence instead of its presence. *I truly don’t see this scent as being a sexy scent in any way shape or usage. *Ain’t no cuddling going to go on on No.88’s account. *Simply no way.

    Another austere scent that I had to think about while wearing No.88 around is Van Cleef & Arpels’s Tsar. *Tsar is very stand alone, solid, cold like frozen metal railings in the winter that your friends tried to make you lick, but I like Tsar a lot and think it is very fun to smell. *No.88 doesn’t have the same charm. *

    Wearing it yesterday I put this note down, thinking of what to write to Christian:
    “Don’t see it as attractive. *Not something to bring in women. *Unless gangster molls, who have to flatter the macho man and have that self-imposed I’m-weak-in-the-knees-looking-at-you hired sort of look.” *Instead I wrote Christian that if you’re going to wear No.88 to work you had better be the boss in the office. *

    No.88 is a gunrunner’s fragrance. *Underworld powerful and stereotypically powerful gentlemanly in the sense of aspirations to power without lessons in charm and charisma. *There is a character in Robert Penn Warren’s book All the Kings Men, who would be wearing No.88 I think. *In the story there is a pool hall owner, a rough guy who has never had an entree into society but suddenly he has to somehow make an approach to a politically active doctor and get him to stop some city action or something. *The doctor lives all the graces of society and is ennobled by the depth of his education. *So the pool hall owner hires a guy who hangs out smoking in his pool hall to go see the doctor. *The guy he hires is a rough and tumble guy, but one who styles himself as a “gentleman,” wearing good suits, worrying about keeping the creases in his pants, and always with shiny shoes and a clean haircut. *Warren even writes that the rumor was that this pool hall gentleman had his initials sewn into his silk boxer shorts. *This guy is the pool hall owner’s image of a gentleman and thus he hires him to go see the doctor and bond with him gentleman-to-gentleman style. *I think that is how the story went. *Naturally the plan doesn’t work—the doctor throws the pool hall smoker gentleman out his door. *My point is this pool hall gentleman would be wearing No.88. *

    Not a favorable review, I guess. *I know there are people on this forum who like No.88 a lot, including my friends Christian and John. *John wrote an up-thumb review of it on its page even, saying it reminds him of lemony furniture oil. *The problem for me is that I don’t think No.88 is bad, fake, or anything to regret wearing. *I’ve even liked wearing it. *I like it because it has the flavor of the rise of modernity for me. *This is that early 20th century gentlemanly quality it has. *It smells like soaps, scented powders, scented hair-tonic, scented brushes, a whole scented travel kit for the gentleman flying on the Pan Am Clipper to Asia. *It reminds me of large porcelain sinks in old airport terminals—designed to be places where men would do all their toiletries during long journeys by propeller airplanes. *It reminds me of hard bars of soap that crack down their length and take elbow grease to get into a lather. *No.88 reminds me of pumice stones. *

    In a sense this is a throwback to the Victorian era and its idea of the White Man’s burden. *I took another note wearing it yesterday: “Pumice stone. *Hard & cracked type of soap. *What one would wear off to charm the South China Sea. *Pan Am Clipper voyageurs. *Dress for dinner. *Conrad’s Lord Jim-esque gentlemen waited on in clubs by natives. *White-man’s burden and make money by gunrunning scent. *A scent for scoundrels.”

    Believe me, I keep trying to say something good about this, but the rascally images keep their grip on my brain. *It was fun wearing No.88 yesterday, especially walking around thinking I was a walking pitcher of ice water—if anyone smelled me too much they would get brain freeze! *

    The scent does not change much in the course of wearing it, and lasts a really healthy long time. *Sorry this is such a long review filled with mixed metaphores and references! *It sure has been fun to write. *I thank Christian for all the fun and back and forth trying to figure this potion out.

    Regards,
    --Chris.
    Chris, it was a joy to read your thoughts, I can't quite fathom gangsters wearing this, however I'm inclined to agree that scoundrels, cads or even rakish men might consider sporting this fragrance, No.88 is so unique that it can make one conjure different images in ones head...
    Let your nose be your pilot

  4. #34

    Default Re: czech and speake no. 88

    [blue]Wow Chris, magnificent response; a real pleasure to read.

    I wonder what kind of post it would have been if you liked the fragrance. Ironic isn't is that sometimes more interesting responses are produced by ambiguous or antithetical feelings. Quality writing. Many thanks my friend for the verbal joy ride. It was a lot of fun.

    Regards,

    scentemental[/blue]




  5. #35

    Default Re: czech and speake no. 88

    This is such a great thread! If there was a library with soon-to-be-classique-threads I would beg the moderators to stick this one in there. Thanks a lot guys! I'm bookmarking this one for future reference.

  6. #36

    Default Re: czech and speake no. 88

    I vote No. 88 as the No. 1 "widest spectrum of opinions" fragrance here on Basenotes.

  7. #37

    Default Re: czech and speake no. 88

    I think a certain Mr Mugler may have something to say about that.

  8. #38

    Default Re: czech and speake no. 88

    Quote Originally Posted by Dante
    I think a certain Mr Mugler may have something to say about that.
    Gives me an idea for a new poll ...

    What's the most controversial fragrance on Basenotes ... Hmm ....

  9. #39

  10. #40

    Default Re: czech and speake no. 88

    Quote Originally Posted by DustB
    Here's a self-aggrandising post if there ever was one.

    This is a great thread on No.88--several sides, several interpretations, and several different extremely thoughtful reactions. *I just can't not get involved!

    Three years ago I posted the following review on another No.88 thread, one that Ruslan started. *Thanks to another member, Christian, I had a sample of No.88 and Christian and I traded messages off board about our thougths on this fragrance. *On the basis of that discussion, I wrote Ruslan's thread the following review. *I beg all who have read it before to forgive me.
    --Chris

    Ruslan,
    I’m glad you asked about Czech & Speake’s No.88 yesterday—it happens that Christian and I are trading messages trying to figure out this scent, what it is like, and even if we like it, on our own. *

    I said it makes me feel mean because I think the scent is really austere, and has no warmth, invitation, charm, or friendliness to it. *It is very distinct, and does not smell BAD at all, but it is one that I think sets a hostile aura. *In that way it is a really nice piece of perfumery art. *It succeeds as a decent thing to smell, but it is stripped of happy warm associations and Proustian moments.

    The scent is very dry and lemony. *Very medicinal, and almost rubbing alcohol harsh. *I searched Basenotes to see if I could find the year of its creation (can’t), but I would place it in a category with Aqua di Parma. *No.88’s vision of what a man is and what a man should smell like is of the same genre as AdP, although the two do not smell alike. *Modifications of the effervescent Eau de Cologne scents of the 19th century (I think of Guerlain’s Imperial and Eau de Cologne or Eau de Guerlain, can’t remember which it is), these scents just seek to make you smell freshly washed, well trimmed, and professionally manicured. *They aren’t dandy like scents, especially not No.88. *It seems to be cleanliness and a sneer in a bottle.

    Going back and forth with Christian about this, I told him I thought the scent was simply scary. *Then he reminded me of how in an earlier message he had said No.88 made him think of a medieval castle fortress. *I had forgotten this reference of his when I was starting to think of the scent as scary—that is an indication of how we both had similar instincts based on the scent. *Christian said he thought that is probably why Ozzy wears it. *

    Stoney and cold is dead on the money about this stuff, I say. *It hits the nose like touching a rock in medium-to-cold weather. *A rock feels colder than the air temperature because it leeches out the warmth of your fingers touching it or something, and that is how No.88 works in the nose. *You get the feeling of draftiness all around you. *At one point in my notes on it I said it was like smelling the vapors over a pitcher of extremely cold ice-filled ice water outside on a cold day. *Sometimes wearing No.88 is like being forced to drink that pitcher all at once too. *

    In contrast to other dark Goth crypt-like scents--Passage d’Enfer, Messe de Minuit (I’ve not smelled this one and thus guess at what follows), Halston 1-12--there is no burning incense or devotional candles to enliven or enchant this one. *Not even the humid, vegetal, warmth of decay and closeness to the earth that seeps through stony cracks in sewers and church basements.

    I have still tried to find a note of warmth in it, a note of tenderness and hints of get-close-to-me-and-be-my-special-one in No.88, but I really can’t. *I think there is a middle note of faint cinnamon which would qualify, but I often mistake ingredients in scents so it probably isn’t cinnamon. *The hint is so subtle that for me it really suggests its absence instead of its presence. *I truly don’t see this scent as being a sexy scent in any way shape or usage. *Ain’t no cuddling going to go on on No.88’s account. *Simply no way.

    Another austere scent that I had to think about while wearing No.88 around is Van Cleef & Arpels’s Tsar. *Tsar is very stand alone, solid, cold like frozen metal railings in the winter that your friends tried to make you lick, but I like Tsar a lot and think it is very fun to smell. *No.88 doesn’t have the same charm. *

    Wearing it yesterday I put this note down, thinking of what to write to Christian:
    “Don’t see it as attractive. *Not something to bring in women. *Unless gangster molls, who have to flatter the macho man and have that self-imposed I’m-weak-in-the-knees-looking-at-you hired sort of look.” *Instead I wrote Christian that if you’re going to wear No.88 to work you had better be the boss in the office. *

    No.88 is a gunrunner’s fragrance. *Underworld powerful and stereotypically powerful gentlemanly in the sense of aspirations to power without lessons in charm and charisma. *There is a character in Robert Penn Warren’s book All the Kings Men, who would be wearing No.88 I think. *In the story there is a pool hall owner, a rough guy who has never had an entree into society but suddenly he has to somehow make an approach to a politically active doctor and get him to stop some city action or something. *The doctor lives all the graces of society and is ennobled by the depth of his education. *So the pool hall owner hires a guy who hangs out smoking in his pool hall to go see the doctor. *The guy he hires is a rough and tumble guy, but one who styles himself as a “gentleman,” wearing good suits, worrying about keeping the creases in his pants, and always with shiny shoes and a clean haircut. *Warren even writes that the rumor was that this pool hall gentleman had his initials sewn into his silk boxer shorts. *This guy is the pool hall owner’s image of a gentleman and thus he hires him to go see the doctor and bond with him gentleman-to-gentleman style. *I think that is how the story went. *Naturally the plan doesn’t work—the doctor throws the pool hall smoker gentleman out his door. *My point is this pool hall gentleman would be wearing No.88. *

    Not a favorable review, I guess. *I know there are people on this forum who like No.88 a lot, including my friends Christian and John. *John wrote an up-thumb review of it on its page even, saying it reminds him of lemony furniture oil. *The problem for me is that I don’t think No.88 is bad, fake, or anything to regret wearing. *I’ve even liked wearing it. *I like it because it has the flavor of the rise of modernity for me. *This is that early 20th century gentlemanly quality it has. *It smells like soaps, scented powders, scented hair-tonic, scented brushes, a whole scented travel kit for the gentleman flying on the Pan Am Clipper to Asia. *It reminds me of large porcelain sinks in old airport terminals—designed to be places where men would do all their toiletries during long journeys by propeller airplanes. *It reminds me of hard bars of soap that crack down their length and take elbow grease to get into a lather. *No.88 reminds me of pumice stones. *

    In a sense this is a throwback to the Victorian era and its idea of the White Man’s burden. *I took another note wearing it yesterday: “Pumice stone. *Hard & cracked type of soap. *What one would wear off to charm the South China Sea. *Pan Am Clipper voyageurs. *Dress for dinner. *Conrad’s Lord Jim-esque gentlemen waited on in clubs by natives. *White-man’s burden and make money by gunrunning scent. *A scent for scoundrels.”

    Believe me, I keep trying to say something good about this, but the rascally images keep their grip on my brain. *It was fun wearing No.88 yesterday, especially walking around thinking I was a walking pitcher of ice water—if anyone smelled me too much they would get brain freeze! *

    The scent does not change much in the course of wearing it, and lasts a really healthy long time. *Sorry this is such a long review filled with mixed metaphores and references! *It sure has been fun to write. *I thank Christian for all the fun and back and forth trying to figure this potion out.

    Regards,
    --Chris.
    chris what an epic review it reads like you've been on the mind expanding recreational stimulants for sure work that vocabulary man.

Similar Threads

  1. Czech and Speake No. 88 Impressions
    By Sandalwood in forum Male Fragrance Discussion
    Replies: 47
    Last Post: 2nd November 2012, 12:32 AM
  2. Czech & Speake NO.88: An original recipe?
    By magnnum in forum Male Fragrance Discussion
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 5th July 2006, 04:38 PM
  3. Talk to me aout Oxford & Cambridge by Czech & Speake
    By Rockford in forum Male Fragrance Discussion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10th June 2006, 06:22 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  



Loving perfume on the Internet since 2000