Thats a good price for a Malle. But cheap, I think not.
At least in the thread several did, taunting me with answers like "in heaven" "ask his maids" (got that reply 2x), "just pony up and spend 230" etc . . .
But, no harm in asking right? in fact, "Ask and ye shall receive", don't they say???
For you see, a private message from a dear darling basenoter came turning me on to a bottle of Musc Ravageur on concession at a scent store for 121$ delivered!
Take that Frederick Malle (who wouldn't send me samples after leading me on with the questionairre and responding (as they seem to to so many) "perhaps you could love bigardee concentree or angeliques sous la pluie" (which I suspect are merely the scents that don't do so well in the men's market)!!!
Also, I found a MUCH nicer salesperson at Barney's than the one who LIED about there being no Malle samples. Maybe with the money I saved I'll pick up a bottle of Avignon from him, since it never seems to go for less than only pennies below retail on ebay....
Last edited by supermarky; 8th September 2006 at 04:41 AM.
Thats a good price for a Malle. But cheap, I think not.
You'll have to PM me to let me know who the SA is so I can seek him out!
"Why not seize the pleasure at once?"
-- Jane Austen (Sun, and Mercury in Sagittarius)
Malle has been VERY generous with many members on this board. They sent me three 5ml samples last year. That's 15ml. Considering 50ml costs on average 85euros... That is very, very, very generous.
Last edited by myaccolades; 8th September 2006 at 06:45 AM.
It would only be generous of them if 50ml actually COST 85 euros to MAKE. Truth is, I'm sure it takes just as much to make a Liz Claiborne scent as it does to make a Malle scent. The name on the bottle is what marks the price up. You gotta remember when you have a bottle of cologne all you have is glass, oil, alcohol, and water. Nothing expensive about that.Originally Posted by myaccolades
I disagree.Originally Posted by Thrax
When Claiborne wants a scent to smell of roses, they'll go with a mixture of citronellol, geraniol, nerol, linalool, phenyl ethyl alcohol, farnesol, stearoptene, α-pinene, ß-pinene, α-terpinene, limonene, p-cymene, camphene, ß-caryophyllene, neral, citronellyl acetate, geranyl acetate, neryl acetate, eugenol, methyl eugenol, rose oxide, α-damascenone, ß-damascenone, benzaldehyde, benzyl alcohol, rhodinyl acetate, phenyl ethyl formate... etc. It probably smells pretty damn close to roses (if they even bother to use all of those chemicals... you can get a pretty decent rose representation with just a few of those). When Malle wants roses, I'm sure he'll use a premium rose otto or rose absolute, which is much, much, much more expensive. Sure, he'll make a handy profit off of his stuff, but saying that Malle and Claiborne cost the same amount to make is highly unlikely.
But you still cant say that it takes $230 to make a bottle of Malle. Even if they do use the good stuff. Creed is "supposed" to use all natural ingrediants and thier prices are half of that.Originally Posted by Stuffman
That wasn't my point. Of course Malle makes a killing off of those bottles, but he still has much more overhead than Claiborne. The ingredients cost more, the bottles probably cost *much* more (it's cheap to make millions of bottles, but expensive to make low batches of custom bottles, as plain-looking as they may be). Even though $230 is astronomic for a fragrance, I'd bet that he sells with a significantly lower percent markup than Claiborne.
Of course Malle makes a proft, a good one I´m sure.
But to compare the quality of his stuff with mass market brands is ridiclous. I don´t even like the majority of their catalog, but every single one I´ve tried has smellt more "natural" and definitely more original compared to most of the stuff out there. In any case, more exclusive raw materials or not - although this too is a fact just by smelling most of them, there´s just so much more effort put into the creation process - in it self warranting a higher price tag.
And what´s this 230$ example? Is it carnal flower?
The 50 ml bottles usually retail for around 100$ don´t they?
I see we have both made our points though. We teamed up and attacked it from both sides.Originally Posted by Stuffman
Well you put it right when u said supposed,I've got on a box of Himalaya some of their natural ingredients written on a label,let me write them down for you if I can..))Originally Posted by Thrax
)after alcohol,aqua(water) parfum is
alpha isomethyl ionone
hydrosiisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde
Its a long time since "a level" chemistry. Are any of those ingredients actual fragrance ingredients or are they presevatives, skin demulcents etc?
I would feel very confident saying that the ingredients used to make a Malle or any other frag. can be had for less than $5. Get over it.
The potential of benzyl salicylate, an important fragrance and flavour ingredientOriginally Posted by hirch_duckfinder
(organic chemistry) C14H12O3 A thick liquid with a slight, pleasant odor; used as a fixer in perfumery and in sunburn preparations.
benzyl alcohol ether with isoeugenol benzyl isoeugenyl ether. Odor Description :, sweet fruity spicy carnation.
Eugenol and isoeugenol, characteristic aromatic constituents of spices, are biosynthesized via reduction of a coniferyl alcohol ester
Cinnamal Fragrance with restrictions on use/concentration fragrance with restrictions on use/concentration set by International Fragrance Association
Linalool A colorless liquid with a woody, floral scent reminiscent of lavender and lily of the valley, linalool intoxicates the olfactory senses in a wide range of perfumery applications and fine cosmetics. It's even found in Fido's bedding, giving him the soothing odor he deserves.Linalool
Fragrance (Parfum) from natural essential oils. Linalool is a naturally occurring component of essential oils, such as Lavender Oil, Bergamot Oil, Geranium Oil and Ylang-Ylang Oil.
Citronellol, or dihydrogeraniol, is a natural acyclic monoterpenoid. Both enantiomers occur in nature. (+)-Citronellol, which is found citronella oils, is the more common isomer. (−)-Citronellol is found in the oils of rose and geranium. Citronellol is used in perfumes.
Citronellol is a fragrant chemical that occurs naturally in many plant oils, and in certain fruits and beverages. As a pesticide active ingredient, citronellol is used on food crops and ornamentals to attract mites, a significant agricultural pest. Because citronellol is used in tiny amounts compared to background exposures and shows minimal to no toxicity in laboratory studies, no harm is expected to humans or the environment when users follow label instructions.
Limonene is a hydrocarbon, classed as a terpene. It is a clear, colourless liquid at room temperatures with an extremely strong smell of oranges. It takes its name from the lemon, as the rind of the lemon, like other citrus fruits, contains considerable amounts of this chemical compound, which is responsible for much of their smell. Limonene is a chiral molecule, and as is common with such forms, biological sources produce one specific enantiomer: the principal industrial source, citrus fruit, contains d-limonene ((+)-limonene), which is the (R)-enantiomer (CAS number 5989-27-5, EINECS number 227-813-5). Racemic limonene is known as dipentene.
As the main odor constituent of citrus (plant family Rutaceae), d-limonene is used in food manufacturing as a flavoring, and added to cleaning products such as hand cleansers to give a lemon-orange fragrance. See: orange oil.
Alpha-Isomethyl Ionone-Reminiscent of orris & violet chemical found in many frags
butylphenyl methylpropional-chemical found in many frags
methyl 2-octynotate, chemical found in many frags
hydrosisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde i presume another chemical..
Also two very good websites when it comes to cancerigen ingredients and their risk http://www.ewg.org/reports/skindeep2/?key=nosign
this one lists all the frags that contain a certain ingredient in which you're interested in
And this one is very nice with photos explanations, A small guide to Nature's fragrances - aspects of the chemistry of the essential oils (and other materials of perfumery or culinary interest)
I guess not too many natural ingredients found in Creeds..)))))))))
Wow - thanks for that. Not only is it a long time ago but *I SHOULD HAVE BEEN LISTENING* now why didn't anyone tell me that at the time??????.......wait a minute.....they did....argghhhhhh.......(enter self pitying mid-life-crisis mode)Originally Posted by marcos_xs
Well I guess they tried to..)))))Originally Posted by hirch_duckfinder
Scentinell, are you serious?
On what is your statement based?
In many monasterys and hermitages here the monks are making the mir (it's a hallowed and perfumed oil) with different aromas. I took once two little containers, one with jasmine and one with lilac aromas. One day I put some on my hand and asked my grandma to smell it (BTW she used all her life Guerlains and Diors) and she found it exquisite; she thought it was a very expensive perfume. And in a way she was right as I am yet to find a perfume in which the jasmine smells like the one in that oil. The only problem was that it didn't had sillage as there was no alcohol in it; and the best part is that it was very, very cheap.
Maybe there are more expensive oils out there from plants that are not too common, but the majority are not and I think that the perfume brands should stop justifying their high prices by saying that they use natural oils...
Last edited by Luca; 8th September 2006 at 12:05 PM.
Well, no one makes anyone buy anything.
If you don´t think it´s worth the price, then just don´t purchase. =)
I don't think it's a problem with the high prices; the problem is that they try to justify these prices by saying that they use natural oils. A good perfume is more then the sum of its parts and I don't mind the high prices, but the companys shouldn't think that their clients are morons who don't have a clue...
bah?Originally Posted by scentinell
Originally Posted by MonkeyManMatt
Absolutely serious. Any chemist can look at the ingredients on any perfume and tell you the same. Even a 20% EDP consists of 80% alcohol and water, which costs a few cents at most for say 4oz when bought in bulk. The rest of the oils and chemicals -- less than one ounce conmbined in a 4oz bottle -- probably cost no more than a few bucks (at the very most) when bought in bulk. With the $5 est. I was being generous assuming that some niche house might use something truly rare (albeit in minute amounts). I'm not saying thee's anything wrong in all of this, your paying for the genius who thought up your special frag., no different then paying $25 for a pill that cost .25 cents to make.
... humbug...?Originally Posted by Joel_Cairo
I'll get me coat...
~ My Wardrobe
no "bah?" as in "what in god's name do you think you are talking about?!"Originally Posted by lessthanthree
God I swear I am sorry for starting this whole debate. Please god, let us not tear eachothers throat's out. Deliver us good pizza, and we will be happy. Also I hear this Thrax fellow is wanting a bottle of Mure et Musc Extreme by L'Artisan. Please god help him out. He is so broke, he cant even pay attention. Amen. (and no I'm not praying to Thierry Mugler)
The only problem with your analysis sentinell is that it's far too generalized. It might apply to many fragrances but it doesn't apply to all as you seem to believe. A small amount of high-grade absolute or even a high-grade synthetics, such as those used in Malle fragrances, for example, will significantly raise the price well above the random $5.00 mark you quote, it seems from the top of your head.Originally Posted by scentinell
I am never heard from "Any chemist" that the bottom line for the cost of any bottle is $5.00, but I have heard from industry insiders that it can and many times frequently does go well over this though never to the levels suggested by the full retail price of a bottle.
Unless you have harder evidence and an actually cost analysis sheet, most of us will take your insistence that the juice in ALL bottles, no matter what the house, has a bottom line cost of $5.00, with a grain of salt. It sounds like a nice way to characterize the big bad niche companies who are trying to rip us off, but it has little basis in the reality of high cost, high end perfumery ingredients. Again, the basis of my claim, actually conversations in my travels with perfumers, perfumery material manufacturers, and actual chemists working for the big boys of perfume making.
Even more important than the magic $5.00 mark, I don't think telling seasoned, established, and respected Basenoters to "get over it", is going to make your claim any truer or any more believable. Such stridency is not a good idea. Eventually most of us are going to stop engaging you in conversation if you keep it up.
Last edited by scentemental; 8th September 2006 at 02:39 PM.
JESUS! I felt the chill off that cold shoulder all the way over here. The very warmth of my blood seems stolen away. Scentemental always has some damn good posts! HOO RAH!Originally Posted by scentemental
Excellent post scentemental.
The fragrances containing real rose oil for instance should be a big exception.
Many of us saw the tiny bottle of rose absolute that Azsmells pasted from e-bay the other week. The tiniest amount was well over a 1000$ .
I would guess that Claiborne and such companies actually make proportionally more per bottle than the likes of MPG and Malle.
Thanks Thrax and MMM.
I don't think there's anyone who would disagree with scentinell's basic point, certainly not me, but more with the manner in which he makes it.
Absolutely MMM, but there is also a variation within niche companies in terms of how much the unit cost per bottle comes down to depending on the quality and concentration of their ingredients.Originally Posted by MonkeyManMatt
A very general rule of thumb for niche fragrances is usually that the more product out there in the gray market, the lower the unit cost per bottle at the manufacturing stage. Of course, other things come into play, like how much a company limits its distribution, but, like I said, it's a general rule of thumb so it shouldn't be taken as the final statement on determining quality. There are many factors that come into play as I hope to show below.
A good comparison to illustrate my point is say between Czech & Speake and the newer Creeds. Czech & Speake has decided to limit its distribution, and Creed has gone the opposite direction, SMW even turning up in K-Mart, and that's one of the reason you won't see a tester bottle of Czech and Speake Cuba or No. 88 selling for under $50.00--if you can find one selling for any price at all on the gray market, you'll be lucky--as you will say the same tester bottle of Silver Mountain Water. I have it on good authority that wholesalers get such a bottle for under $20.00. But if you also trust your nose, you can certainly tell the quality difference between say SMW and Cuba (BTW, I am not knocking SMW in any way. I happen to like it quite a bit), which is another reason you won't find a Czech & Speake bottle selling at the reduced prices of many modern Creeds.
I even heard from a friend in England, who heard from a friend who heard from a friend, that Czech & Speake discontinued production of Dark Rose when they switched to a new production company in England--as opposed to the old on which was located in Italy--because they weren't willing to compromise the formulation with cheaper alternative aoud and rose sources.
If you smell Czech & Speake Dark Rose, you'll definitely understand what I am talking about when I talk about high quality absolutes and synthetics. I am pretty sure the aoud in Dark Rose is synthetic, but damn it's fine. There is no doubt at all that the rose in Dark Rose is the finest quality rose absolute available. As I noted in a recent post on rose fragrances, Dark Rose trumps any of the Montale aoud line in terms of the quality of both the rose and the aoud. I also suspect that Czech & Speake's basic rose fragrance was discontinued for the same reason.
There is another dimension in determining the use of quality of ingredients in top end fragrances and that is the way a company operates and conceive of itself. I am mostly 100% sure that Czech & Speake uses extraordinarily high quality ingredients in their fragrances because they don't necessarily conceive of themselves as primarily a perfume house. Czech & Speake are primarily high-end purveyors of bathroom fixtures and their "aromatics" line is seen as a way of enhancing their prestige rather than as its prime money making product. The weren’t offering their aromatics line for almost a year and a half when looking for a new manufacturer. They can, therefore, afford to be more extravagant in their choice and use of high-end ingredients and also in terms of the concentration of those high-end ingredients.
Finally, I think that if we could actually get a cost analysis sheet of our favorite niche and designer fragrances, we certainly would be very surprised at how much the final retail cost of a fragrance is added cost above initial cost of producing the fragrance as juice pure and simple.
Last edited by scentemental; 9th September 2006 at 06:11 AM.
Why are we debating about the cost of a fragrance based solely on it's physical constituants?
You don't pay for the juice, you pay for the nose that creates it. You pay for the creation.
You're paying for the product as a whole, not just the juice itself, or the bottle, or the name.
Do you all know what I mean?
Yeah, a pair of Puma kickers is probably only 35 cents worth of material but you pay for the design, the workmanship, the label. It's the same with fragrances.
Last edited by myaccolades; 8th September 2006 at 04:33 PM.
Originally Posted by myaccolades
I am not:
Originally Posted by scentemental
And don't forget labor costs, costs for insurance, rental for stores and a warehouse space, benefits for employees, taxes, legal fees, etc. etc..., it's just incredible how much money it takes to run even a small business, and it all has to be folded into the product.
And oh, equipment maintenance and repair and upgrades, computers and software, tech consultants, website developer...have I made my point yet???
Don't forget the overhead for Frederick's overinflated ego! Those houses on the French Riviera aren't cheap...Originally Posted by Elf
"I exist for myself, and for those to whom my unquenchable thirst for freedom gives everything, but also for everyone, since insofar as I am able to love - I love everyone. Of noble hearts, I am the noblest - and the most generous of those that yearn to give love in return. - I am a human being, I love death and I love life."
Egon Schiele - Self-Potrait
My classics: Dior Homme EdT, YSL Rive Gauche PH, Helmut Lang Cuiron, L'Occitane Neroli (vintage), Davidoff Zino, L'Occitane Eau des Baux
I wonder if there is an industry group which can verify claims like :
"...created from essences of unparalleled quality and contain the highest percentages of natural components in the French perfume industry."
"...and contains the highest amount of natural tuberose absolute in any fragrance"
"...has restored the grand art of perfume blending, using only high 18-22 percent concentrations of pure eau de parfums - the long lasting concentrations of the legendary vintage scents of the 1920s and 1930s."
Can these perfumes be reverse-engineered to verify these claims ?
Whats stopping a reasonably rich Joe Schmoe from opening up a fragrance business with a snazzy website and start selling cheaply made perfumes to make some money (especially considering that not all fragrances which use such high quality ingredients smell all that different to quite a few discernible noses) ?
I received early this week also 3 x 5ml. samples from Malle, exactly as I requested. I will be testing them this weekend.
If I really like one of those I will definitely be buying one bottle soon.
« L'odeur de rose, faible, grâce au vent léger d'été qui passe, se mêle aux parfums qu'elle a mis.»
[ Paul Verlaine ]
I think paying over $1 million for a painting is stupid because all it is is paint.
a polyester pucci shirt selling for 800-1000 at barney's doesn't cost that much more to make than the liz clairborne version for $70
you are paying for exclusivity with designer/niche, always.
"my friends don't want to smell ike their maids" more than anything else
First let me apologize to any who took my post as "strident" or otherwise insulting. Not my intent, and not my point. As to the factual issue, I concede that I have not explored all the ways that any given frag might exceed $5 to produce, and there are no absolutes in anything really.
That said, no one has offered proof in another direction. It's all "what I heard" or that some exotic rose oil costs a whole lot -- without any evidence of what a mfgr might pay for such an oil or how much makes it into a bottle. In most countries, once you get down to the ingredients listed at the bottom or only as "fragrance," the concentration is less than 1% -- by Weight! So, unless the precious stuff is listed up front after alcohol or water, your talking bubkus as to the amount in the bottle.
But to see how much things really cost, start with the premise that retailers rarely sell at a loss. Then take a bottle of say Bulgari pour homme, a respectable juice I think we can all agree. They produce crates of so-called "testers" that sell for under $20 -- I strongly suspect this is to allow sales at a discount, not that Bulgari got fooled into how many real testers it needed. If we assume the retail markup is 50% (a very low number in this area), then that would leave $10 bucks between the mfgr and the distibutor to get their cut. Knowing this tells me with near metaphysical certainty that the juice can't be costing more than a few bucks. I've seen the same phenomenon with TM Cologne and others -- the main issue being how loosely distribution is controlled, not the cost of the juice.
If you folks believe that companies like Bulgari are using cheap junk and Malle uses stuff that costs far, far, far more and in large doses, ok, perhaps your right. Neither of us have hard evidence it seems. But over the years the common denominator in price has always been distribution not juice costs. An extravagant frag. once it hits all distribution channels (if it can) gets dirt cheap. I don't think it's reasonable to conclude that everyone is losing money or the ingredient costs just plumetted.
Someone said earlier that a retailer can get a Creed for $20 and that sounds about right -- if so do you dispute that the juice inside can't possibly have cost more than $5? Seems common sense to me. Gendarme has a reputation for using high quality ingredients, and charges $60-70 for Gendarme 20. Yet when Sephora recently wanted to blow out the line, they sold it for $18 bucks, and I feel pretty good that even then they weren't losing money. Again all of this is not to insult, I'm one of you when it comes to shelling out for the juice, I just try not to think about what it cost to make. Peace.
Ahem, I read this and about fell down from my chair. I did not know whether to laugh or cry, actually I wanted to do both at the same time, which by the way is very, very hard to do.Originally Posted by scentinell
Scentinell my friend, I am not trying to make fun of anyone by this post. Somebody, somewhere along the line gave you, and that certain someone you mentioned absolutely wrong information, trust me I know the wholesale prices
Wrong about this one too.Originally Posted by scentinell
When I was an IT consultant, we had a saying "When you assume things, you make an ass out of yourself ". Never, never assume things my friend, find out the reliable and relevant facts first.
They were , and they were not too. Let me explain some retail tricks of big companies. They were selling it under their cost at that price, to get rid of it from their store, so they lost money there. Why did they do that, possible factors :Originally Posted by scentinell
1) it was not moving fast enough for them
2) they bought a lot of it.
In the long run they felt they would save money if they did that by clearing up shelf space, rent costs money.
then what are the wholesale prices (of creed)?
and sorry I can't resist at "I even heard from a friend in England, who heard from a friend who heard from a friend," one wonders what the person at the end of that long chain might also know about Richard Gere and the gerbil!
Last edited by supermarky; 9th September 2006 at 12:34 AM.
Supermarky, you would have to be within striking distance of me to disclose that, you see my friend I would have to kill you after I tell you .Originally Posted by supermarky
Just kidding. It all depends on where and whom you get it from and the size of the bottle, whether its grey market or from the actual distributor. The wholesale prices from the distributor would be very, very high. All I can tell you is that I can't even get a 4.0 tester bottle from the grey market for thrice the price of what scentinell suggested (from a reliable trusted wholesaler), and I am talking wholesale. After a recent transaction I had with a Basenotes member, I won't even go to the grey market for Creeds. So everybody that thinks they are getting the real deal by getting it for............FORGET IT I WONT GO THERE.
That will open up another can of worms .
Originally Posted by maisonstinky
Well my good man, please reply with facts and not rhetoric. I used 50% as a figure for a markup on a cosmetic or perfume, I too know something about this and believe this is a realistic estimate. If you have a different figure, please share. As to the Creed, you say you can't get a tester for "thrice" the $20 mentioned in this thread. Well, go down to Fragrance row on Broadway in NYC and you can buy legit Creed -- not testers-- in the $70-$80 range easy, very easy. (E.g., http://www.namebrandsperfume.com/ind...27&submit.y=11 ). I'd be literally astonished if these floor to cieling blowout sellers were paying more than $20 a pop. Of course I can't prove this since I don't have their price list. I also don't doubt that certain retailers playing by the book have to pay a heck of alot more. My only point is "gray market" or not, none of these jokers are losing money, so I think one can safely assume the juice cost a whole lot less than the sale price -- which was the whole point of my original post. Assuming we're not talking about outright theft, the fact that anyone in the distribution chain (authorized or not) can sell for at such low prices is proof to me that the juice cost much less than that. Finally, as to Sephora, if you have proof they lost money on the Gendarme deal, please share. My firm conviction is that while your other points (about motive to clean house) are correct, Sephora didn't lose money. My educated guess is they set the price at or slightly under what they paid -- $18 sounds right to me under that theory. The price was so far under retail it would be stupid for Sephora to take a loss. If the stuff cost them $25/bottle, they probably could have moved it nearly as quick at that price.
I am sure we can trust our friend maisonstinky on these retail issues.
All I know is that on average, Creed is the most freakin' expensive at retail($198 for a 2.5Oz bottle of Love in White? Goddamn !). Although its my favorite house, its not worth the retail prices. No house is.
One more quick point which I should have added above. I'm not calling anyone, particularly a retailer, a liar about what they might pay for an item. I say this based on real live first hand knowledge: there can be gigantic differences in what retailers pay from store to store and region to region.
Scentinell I get your point, yes businesses do sell for a profit, if that is what you are trying to drive at, you are right, wont argue on that point.Originally Posted by scentinell
As far as the other points e.g. prices etc I already commented on that and I know all about Fragrance Row in NYC . I won't comment or argue any more on that, in the interest of keeping the thread on the original FM topic
Originally Posted by maisonstinky
Fair enough, it's all good.
you are a good guy indeed .Originally Posted by scentinell
And Supermarky you got a good deal on your FM enjoy it .
I couldn't have said it better.Originally Posted by supermarky
"Why not seize the pleasure at once?"
-- Jane Austen (Sun, and Mercury in Sagittarius)
I wholeheartedly concur.Originally Posted by zztopp
"Why not seize the pleasure at once?"
-- Jane Austen (Sun, and Mercury in Sagittarius)
I've heard a lot about people getting turned down by way of the dreaded silence or just getting one thing, if not simply spritzed paper strips! I did the questionairre. After the suggestions I responded politely asking for those suggestions as all but one, Angelique Sous la Pluie, were original choices. I'd originally chosen Noir Epices for that position but was a bit scared of it so I went for that one. It's all good as I have a sample, however smaller, of Noir Epices now.Originally Posted by supermarky
Anyhow, after a couple weeks went by and I didn't receive anything I wrote them back on a forward of the original response. Next thing I know, despite no reply to that, I received 3 5ml samples. Musc Ravageur, Angelique, and Bigarade Concentree. Loved Concentree, liked Angelique, and despite the adoring fans wasn't crazy about Musc Ravageur. Too saucy for my tastes.
There are alot of "know it all" here. They seem to think every thing expensive is quality. They should be more supportive in their opinions. Do you and screw the snobs. This is the best fragrance site, but there are many snobs.
a veritable herd/gang of snobs, on occasion! anyway, my outlook has to be somewhat charitable uh? since my own posts are such a constant source of embarrassment... tra la la!
This seems like a really weird discussion to have.
The meat that is served at the local Denny's doesn't cost that much less than what they serve at 5-stars restaurants. Does that mean that the nice places are somehow 'wrong' or 'immoral' for charging $200 for a steak?
Market drives price. Sure, the ingredients in a Perkin's omelette cost around $1, but that doesn't mean that the meal should only cost $1.05 or something. Anyone who has worked in production or gourmet foods can tell you that the smaller the run, the higher the prices. It might take me an entire day to make one doohickey at work, but I could make 30 of them in two days if I needed them. The scale of an operation has a huge effect on price.
And I don't appraise my frag purchases like they were race horses. I'm not buying them for some kind of return on my investment or for the tangible chemical content. I buy frags for the pleasure they bring me, and you can't really put a price on pleasure.
Nihil Obstat Ben
Thats quite a good point benOriginally Posted by greyhueofdoubt
Of course, I'd assume that there is a point where the pain of losing X amount of dollars does not equal the pleasure of the scent purchased. Lets say SuperscentX costs $400 for 15mL, it would have to be pretty amazing!
issey miyake once said the pricing is part of the piece and I've always felt that the high prices are meant to guarantee that not so many people will have the expensive item. at least that's what I have told people since 1984 when my friends were beyond shocked that I was wearing a SHIRT that cost $90 (perry ellis).
but I never pay retail, never ever! maybe once in a blue moon... I remember I bought a gaultier shirt at full price in 2003.
oh and I did pay for 5 bottles of mark birley full price over the course of a few years
Last edited by supermarky; 6th November 2006 at 12:45 PM.
So, was anyone able to get Malle on the cheap ?