Glad to see it back!
One thing that needs fixing is the review counts. The number of reviews listed for your top reviewers does not match the number at the top of the page when their name is selected. My belief is the counts are wrong for persons that have added reviews since the site went down. My conjecture is that the counts for new reviews is doubled. (I too seem to be getting 'double credit' for reviews added since the emergence of the new site).
Also when one selects a reviewer to see all their reviews, the font becomes progressively smaller. Really only the top two are readable and the only one that is properly sized is the first one on the list.
And if one selects our most prolific reviewer, it seems like a stress test on the system. It has trouble handling it. Perhaps the use of page breaks would be helpful.