55karl, nothing you ever post has to do with the topic of the thread you're posting in, and all you ever do is try and trash-talk Creed and promote Bond No.9.
I am one of many who believe that you have ulterior motives for participating in these discussions in the first place, and I'd like to suggest that you keep your negativity and accusatory tone to yourself. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion (I for one, think Creed is entirely superior to Bond in just about every way) but at this point, you're basically a troll.
The fact alone that you think that higher sales equates to a better fragrance says to me that you are not going to fit in very well in this community of relatively-unbiased fragrance-lovers who value actual quality over sales and hype.
And to respond to your off-topic statement about Windsor, I really doubt there are many people reading this forum who give the slightest care whether that fragrance was made (exactly as-is) for this Duke of Windsor fellow. I don't even know who he is, and quite frankly the whole idea of a country having a king or queen or duke (whatever the hell that is) is ridiculous to me in the first place. Maybe all it takes for you is for a company to make a claim about the heritage of a fragrance to make you want to buy it (if you're so crazy about all the Bond stuff), but I know that most of us here put the actual smell before anything else.