Code of Conduct
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 61 to 89 of 89
  1. #61

    Default Re: Creed Windsor Returns Fall 2010

    ^As for the organic/natural thing:
    My original intent in sampling thousands of scents, learning of my favorite scents and procuring what I felt to be the best fragrances in the world suited to my particular tastes, was to be able to re-create approximations of them in alcohol-free, or mostly-alcohol-free, organic/natural attars, or pure parfum, however you want to define it. I have come astonishingly close to recreating a small number of them, and nowhere close to a few of my favorite creeds (git, gv, windsor, mi), hence my respect for the house moreso than any other, and my intent has changed where I am now set on keeping many of these alcohol-based scents to scent clothing and serve as a constant comparitive resource to my own experiments...

    Thanks equally to the posts of big-uppers and detractors of my favorite scents, with their knowledge of compositions and ingredient knowledge greater than mine at any given time, and serving as a catalyst to my own curiosity, I have learned a great deal in a few short years, and will certainly learn more. So I, given my perspective, view this dichotomy of for/against as a false one. each informed perspective has value, and many times detractors have inherently more value to me than supporters.

    Peace everyone, continue being opinionated and true to your own desires.
    Anything less is just uncivilised.

  2. #62

    Default Re: Creed Windsor Returns Fall 2010

    Quote Originally Posted by DULLAH View Post
    ^As for the organic/natural thing:
    My original intent in sampling thousands of scents, learning of my favorite scents and procuring what I felt to be the best fragrances in the world suited to my particular tastes, was to be able to re-create approximations of them in alcohol-free, or mostly-alcohol-free, organic/natural attars, or pure parfum, however you want to define it. I have come astonishingly close to recreating a small number of them, and nowhere close to a few of my favorite creeds (git, gv, windsor, mi), hence my respect for the house moreso than any other, and my intent has changed where I am now set on keeping many of these alcohol-based scents to scent clothing and serve as a constant comparitive resource to my own experiments...
    Fascinating, I would love to read about your attempts to recreate some of your favorites and what caused you to fail/succeed at them. Perhaps a topic for a new thread.
    -

  3. #63

    Default Re: Creed Windsor Returns Fall 2010

    Quote Originally Posted by zztopp View Post
    Fascinating, I would love to read about your attempts to recreate some of your favorites and what caused you to fail/succeed at them. Perhaps a topic for a new thread.
    No thanks.
    My work is my possession for now.

  4. #64

    Default Re: Creed Windsor Returns Fall 2010

    Quote Originally Posted by zztopp View Post
    Well thats a bit uncalled for - I don't see any reason for attacking a fellow BN'er. He just discusses and shares his (detailed) opinions - frankly, I have seen a lot worse on the board, with a lot of mindless droning praising oldy classics every other day and a chorus of yes men right nearby. You need to disassociate your love for a frag from anyone who doesn't share the same high enthusiasm.

    Yes, I play with EO's whenever I can (I have a lot of other interests as well and can't afford to spend 100% of my time making love to perfumes and oils), try fragrances whenever I can, and am fortunate enough to have contacts in the beauty/cosmetics industry. I also happen to think that 95% of these natural/organic fragrances aren't up to snuff. Its my opinion and I am sticking to it - anyone else is welcome to disagree with me.

    And Windsor is a great natural smelling frag. But I like Love in Black more. Suck it fellas !
    I wasn't attacking Dullah. I think Dullah's opinions are valid, well spoken, and well researched. I wasn't actually trying to attack anyone, but instead attack the idea of accepting well spoken words as being truth merely based on the eloquence of their delivery.

    Perfume is an extremely difficult art to understand from the outside. Probably one of if not the most difficult of arts to understand as the average persone generally hasno idea how it's done and really have no exposure to the raw materials. They likely never have tried their hand at it like they have with painting or music or writing or any other art. Hence, it is very hard to tell what constitutes true complexity or difficulty in a perfume. There is, for instance, a lot of technical know how in making a long lasting lemon scent - although to the end user they may just say 'bah, a simple and linear lemon, through and through.' The complexity is not apparent as it is in say a four voice fugue or say The School of Athens by Raphael. On the flipside, things that are apparently complex may be rather simple. Many of the bases utilized in scents are complex in and of themselves but simple as they are off-the-shelf solutions, something akin to sampling in modern pop music (although I guess sampling could perhaps better be used to explain the blatant copying of other formulas).

    Anyhow, with the complexity of it all I just find it a bit mistaken or even disingenuous to ever say that X is definitively Y. zztop makes the good point that many/most all natural frags fall far short of the mark and I don't disagree. Many all natural oils and absolutes fall short of the mark, individually speaking. I've smelled many all natural rose ottos that are far worse than the synthetic rose notes in Lyric Man or DC1913. Heck, they are worse than the synthetic rose notes in drugstore women's frags.

    Is Windsor's rose purely all-natural? I don't know. I don't know that it matters. It really only matters if it smells good. We can speculate if that's because it is real or not, or a combination of real and synthetic (as I believe Lyric Man to be), and that speculation is good and healthy. But for any of us outsiders to make a definitive claim is in error, I believe, as is the act of believing it simply because it was said by someone who has a high post count and some experience with oils, etc. I would never want someone to accept my words on that premise alone. Of course, I try not to speak definitively about perfume despite my rather extensive experience with oils, absolutes and blending, simply because all of this learning has shown me more than anything the extent of that which I don't know. There's a reason perfumers spend years learning their essences, the formulas of major hits and classics, and then spend many more years experimenting and blending and learning. It's a difficult art. I believe we reduce the art when we speak about it definitively. Sure, speak about your subjective experience and opinion definitively, but not the objective elements. None of us know enough to do that. I guess this just really irks me because I so often see the blind leading the blind (no, I'm not accusing Dullah of doing this!) on so many blogs. Go read any* designer review on Now Smell This. Note how if the review is negative 95% of the people will write off the scent with out so much as sniffing it. If it is one of those rare positive reviews for a 'generic' designer or celeb scent, you'll suddenly find a much larger portion saying they intend to sniff it, etc. You also see this often where people will write off designers as cheap chemical concoctions but then completely ignore the same when you've got a name like Serge Lutens attached to it (I'm looking at you, Bois de Violette, and your 65% iso e super).

    Sorry for the long and slightly rambly rant. I just often think that a bit of knowledge is worse than no knowledge at all when that knowledge is revered and exalted by lemmings* as being the truth without it being properly questioned. I mostly see this on the blogs, but in many ways I think it is hurting the industry, especially the niche industry. A bunch of *shit* is getting lauded, or, if not lauded at least not as criticized as it should be, simply because of the name on the packaging and a subsequent review or two by a prominent blog that praises the juice that, if it were in a different bottle by a different company, would get endlessly slammed or worse - simply written off as not being worth one's time. And then we wonder why so much niche is junk.

    *almost any. This is more prominent on some blogs but it seems to be quite common throughout. Also, I used the word lemmings not strictly in a derogatory sense but because it is the word chosen as a self-descriptor by many perfumistas themselves.
    Last edited by SculptureOfSoul; 23rd March 2010 at 03:58 AM.
    ***For sale:

    Iris Pallida 50ml

    Ungaro I 75ml

    and more!
    - http://www.basenotes.net/threads/301...n-Man-and-more

  5. #65

    Default Re: Creed Windsor Returns Fall 2010

    SculptureOfSoul, such an amazingly elaborate posting. Thank you for spending so much time trying to educate some of the unthinking lemmings among whom I may be counted or not, I'll never know.

    It is perhaps not entirely justified though to presume that some people like a given fragrance so much because of "the blogs," or because following Dullah's (excellent in their own right) descriptions, like "lemmings," rather than because of their own authentic olfactory experience. After all, appreciating a Bach four voice fugue doesn't necessarily entail having mastered Johann Joseph Fux's Gradus ad Parnassum. One can respond to Bach aesthetically, in genuine modesty, without having mastered Bach's art professionally -- which would be unduly arrogant to presume, anyway, just because one's tinkered with Pachelbel's Canon.

    Obviously I am one of those who dared to like Windsor very much. Before reading any review of it. It's not only that I enjoyed, post festum, Dullah's review, but I've read all his reviews after that and I have noticed a lot of similarities in what regards our response to specific fragrances, Creed and others. That may classify me as a "lemming". I don't know. Never had to trepidatiously ponder that before.

    You claim to "attack the idea of accepting well spoken words as being truth merely based on the eloquence of their delivery". It seems that the hypothesis of "accepting well spoken words" because they express a similarity of response to an olfactory experience, not because of the eloquence of their delivery alone, hasn't even been taken into account. Sadly so, if one may say that.

    Similarly, when you say that "I try not to speak definitively about perfume despite my rather extensive experience with oils, absolutes and blending" you somehow defeat the purpose of that noble credo by saying in almost the same breath "A bunch of *shit* [starry emphasis in the original] is getting lauded". It is truly hard to speak any more "definitively" than that. I doubt any of the admirers of Windsor would have gone as far in speaking "definitively" on the subject.

    You were kind enough to let us know that "a bit of knowledge is worse than no knowledge at all". Only a master perfumer could afford to write such wise and (somewhat) modest words. Would you be so kind as to let us know which fragrant masterpieces you have created and where they may be sampled? If they are arguably better than (or at least the equal of) Windsor, one is surely looking forward to the experience. Please share. Thank you so very much.
    Last edited by Addict; 23rd March 2010 at 06:24 AM.

  6. #66

    Default Re: Creed Windsor Returns Fall 2010

    Quote Originally Posted by Addict View Post
    Perhaps they had a limited number of unnumbered, unsold flacons for gifts, for the family, for the "uncommercial" (museum-like) vault or something. I actually believe that they did not make more than 100 total in the first batch. I can personally testify that I have asked about it during a trip to Paris, at the Creed boutique in Paris (honestly I was hoping I might find a slightly cheaper Windsor flacon), and the French representatives (who speak good English) made it very clear they didn't get one single flacon for sale. They actually didn't know how it smelled like.
    Having worked in the French luxury sector, Armani, Valentino, Chanel and others, for over 25 years, I can tell you that there are always items made specifically for the US, Russian and Middle Eastern markets. It seems that Windsor was made to coincide with the opening of the New York shop. A funny parallel can be found in the auto industry, Mercedes Benz makes quite a few workman models that are never allowed to be sold in the US, in order to protect the American's perception that a Mercedes is a top, luxury automobile. I have certainly ridden in enough of these cloth seated, diesel engine, Mercedes taxi sedans on my way in from the airport in Germany to have the brand demystified for me.
    Last edited by Kevin Guyer; 26th March 2010 at 10:29 PM.

  7. #67

    Default Re: Creed Windsor Returns Fall 2010

    Does anyone else get a really STRONG Erolfa tone from Windsor ?
    To my nose it's as if they just took Erolfa and added a little woods to it.

  8. #68

    Default Re: Creed Windsor Returns Fall 2010

    So after owning Windsor for - well, since it was released - I gave it another try a few days ago. A nice dose about five sprays, on the way to my office. I had several compliments. And no, I wasn't really worried that they were "turn that shit down" compliments. The women in my office actually loved it.

    One of the problems I had with Windsor in the past was being too shy about spraying. I usually wear it in the evening only, just one or two shots. I think it was Mr. Redneck Perfumisto who advised "don't by shy about spraying it." He's right.
    Last edited by mrcologneguy; 15th April 2010 at 01:33 AM.

  9. #69

    Default Re: Creed Windsor Returns Fall 2010

    Quote Originally Posted by SoGent View Post
    Does anyone else get a really STRONG Erolfa tone from Windsor ?
    To my nose it's as if they just took Erolfa and added a little woods to it.
    owning bottles of both for a while now..... no, I don't get that at all.

  10. #70

    Default Re: Creed Windsor Returns Fall 2010

    NO Erolfa connection that I'd detect. (Just my own nose, of course.)

    Five sprays, really? Not being sarcastic, but isn't that a tad strong?

  11. #71

    Default Re: Creed Windsor Returns Fall 2010

    ^^^Sounds a bit strong, but at least on me the scent wears light enough to probably get away with it. I'll try that next time I wear. Usually use between 3 and 4.

  12. #72

    Default Re: Creed Windsor Returns Fall 2010

    i personally am not a fan of windsor, the rose mixed with sodapop smell (could be the gin) just isn't doing it for me. it is unique and different but i couldnt see myself wearing it.

  13. #73

    Default Re: Creed Windsor Returns Fall 2010

    Quote Originally Posted by Addict View Post
    NO Erolfa connection that I'd detect. (Just my own nose, of course.)

    Five sprays, really? Not being sarcastic, but isn't that a tad strong?
    I wore 32 sprays of this one day, and those 32 sprays manifested no stronger than 2 sprays of joop after 30 minutes or so.

    Oh, and yes, no erolfa connection.
    Suspicious though the newer clear bottle batches of MI do have more of an erolfa connection than previous batches. less rich basenotes to cover that geraniol/salt/ambroxan/seeweed saltiness
    Last edited by DULLAH; 16th April 2010 at 04:16 AM.

  14. #74

    Default Re: Creed Windsor Returns Fall 2010

    Hi Dullah, I've repeatedly asseverated I don't have a nose equal to yours in what regards DETAIL.

    However, I agree with your comment about M. I., on an intuitive level.

    The first renditions I sniffed (~2001 or earlier) were A LOT better than ANYthing I could find now. A lot more citrus... high quality citrus... that "dream" citrus most men look for (and find ASPECTS of it, in Creed BdC or CB or the various Eaux de Guerlain or in Hermes concoctions etc.) and never find it AS A WHOLE.

    The only citrus superior to the BEST M. I. I have sniffed was the long discontinued Les Hesperides de la Grande Serre from L'Artisan... which used to be a non-surprising citrus masterpiece - best five citrus oils, lemon, bergamot, grapefruit, neroli, orange (I think they didn't add any lime) "fixed" through a hint of light musk... everything rendered better through the quality of the ingredients rather than the originality of the composition...

    Nowadays M. I. smells to me on the mediocre side... better than the epitomical Bergner cologne, yet not at the level of (mostly deserved) Creed reputation.

    I prefer Citrus Bigarrade (or Bois de Cedrat) - weak sillage and relative simplicity assumed.

    Tell us more about your experiments with Windsor... are you serious about the "32"????? What were the comments??????????

    The one Creed I feel gains from "excessive" spraying (IF you do it at least an hour before going out) is GIT -- is it the violet leaf thingy? What are your (always interesting) comments on this particular fragrant element?


    The only successful Windsor layering I can report: Citrus bigarrade + W. However, Windsor still smells better by itself, in my opinion.
    Last edited by Addict; 16th April 2010 at 05:47 AM.

  15. #75

    Default Re: Creed Windsor Returns Fall 2010

    [QUOTE=Addict;1810696
    Five sprays, really? Not being sarcastic, but isn't that a tad strong?[/QUOTE]
    Five was about right for me. I've worn Windsor several times, with no notice from anyone around me. I find it disappears quickly on my skin. So yes, I ramped it up, and bam -- worked very well. I wouldn't wear that much in close quarters, though. Not to a movie theater, for example. But Mr. Perfumisto was right - don't be too shy about Windsor.

  16. #76

    Default Re: Creed Windsor Returns Fall 2010

    Quote Originally Posted by mrcologneguy View Post
    But Mr. Perfumisto was right - don't be too shy about Windsor.
    OK, I'll experiment, when I'm not in danger of losing my job. ( :

    Speaking of inimitable things... of which Green I T is one (no matter how many times it's been imitated, and all this is in my opinion of course) - what is that extremely enticing note on the dry-down? Is it violet leaf absolute? If yes, where else is it used prominently? Thank you.
    Last edited by Addict; 18th April 2010 at 07:17 PM.

  17. #77

    Default Re: Creed Windsor Returns Fall 2010

    I gave this a full wearing the other day (Windsor)
    I was not impressed at all, it did smell very unique, but somewhat reminded me of a spicier drier eau de italie
    Off-Site Decants =) (updated 05/16/12)
    http://flacon.ambaric.net/viewtopic....7994440fd3c0ab

  18. #78

    Default Re: Creed Windsor Returns Fall 2010

    Anyone want to send me a sample?

  19. #79

    Default Re: Creed Windsor Returns Fall 2010

    Quote Originally Posted by MikeNY911 View Post
    For what it's worth, when the S/A told me about the re-release of Windsor, he told me it takes about 4 months to make a batch.
    that's what they'll tell you if you ask about any of their scents, not just windsor.

    eric b

  20. #80

    Default Re: Creed Windsor Returns Fall 2010

    Quote Originally Posted by Hasupk@gmail.com View Post
    I was not impressed at all, it did smell very unique, but somewhat reminded me of a spicier drier eau de italie
    No problem, I have never encountered any fragrance, no matter how good, to be completely uncontroversial.

  21. #81

    Default Re: Creed Windsor Returns Fall 2010

    Quote Originally Posted by DULLAH View Post
    I wore 32 sprays of this one day, and those 32 sprays manifested no stronger than 2 sprays of joop after 30 minutes or so.

    Oh, and yes, no erolfa connection.
    Suspicious though the newer clear bottle batches of MI do have more of an erolfa connection than previous batches. less rich basenotes to cover that geraniol/salt/ambroxan/seeweed saltiness
    I have often wondered about that. I remember my first samples of MI smelled quite a bit thicker and warmer to my nose. I've only ever had clear bottles and to this day the sample smells denser. I just chalked it up to batch differences.

    Also I finally tried Windsor. Something I had been putting off mostly because of the insane price tag and limited supply. Now I wish i would have bought a bottle or at least gone in a split.

    WOW!, 32 sprays wow. that must be a record.
    Last edited by Futami; 30th April 2010 at 07:12 AM.

  22. #82

    Default Re: Creed Windsor Returns Fall 2010

    Quote Originally Posted by mrcologneguy View Post
    Wood and Spices. . . yes, yes, can't wait.

    Windsor: nice, but not the knock-your-socks-off experience I was hoping for at this level of price and presentation. This is heresy to many BN fans, but: I would be interested in sniffing the new release of this to see if it's any different from the juice I purchased. To me, it's very close to being a "wow." I'd like it if it were adjusted just a bit. Middle notes could be turned up a little, and it could use a more solid base. Of course, that would substantially alter it. Maybe call it "Windsor Intense"? Har har. . .
    wood and spices sounds like the second draft of original santal, we will see what happens. PLEASE CREED BRING BACK VINTAGE TABAROME!!!

  23. #83

    Default Re: Creed Windsor Returns Fall 2010

    Quote Originally Posted by DavidBond007 View Post
    wood and spices sounds like the second draft of original santal, we will see what happens. PLEASE CREED BRING BACK VINTAGE TABAROME!!!
    god i hope not. Original Santal is okay... but I'm hoping Woods and Spices is more like that Tom Ford private oud smell... forget the name at the moment..

  24. #84

    Default Re: Creed Windsor Returns Fall 2010

    Quote Originally Posted by TalkingMuffin View Post
    god i hope not. Original Santal is okay... but I'm hoping Woods and Spices is more like that Tom Ford private oud smell... forget the name at the moment..
    i didn't care for OS, i hope woods and spices is a classy smell. we will see.

  25. #85

    Default Re: Creed Windsor Returns Fall 2010

    Quote Originally Posted by TalkingMuffin View Post
    god i hope not. Original Santal is okay... but I'm hoping Woods and Spices is more like that Tom Ford private oud smell... forget the name at the moment..
    I would like to see a Creed take on oud.

  26. #86

    Default Re: Creed Windsor Returns Fall 2010

    Quote Originally Posted by DavidBond007 View Post
    wood and spices sounds like the second draft of original santal, we will see what happens. PLEASE CREED BRING BACK VINTAGE TABAROME!!!
    I have spoken to someone who has tried it and they stated that if you like BdP, you will love this one. This is a similar type scent to BdP.

  27. #87

    Default Re: Creed Windsor Returns Fall 2010

    Quote Originally Posted by cairomerta View Post
    I have spoken to someone who has tried it and they stated that if you like BdP, you will love this one. This is a similar type scent to BdP.
    sounds good to me.

  28. #88

    Default Re: Creed Windsor Returns Fall 2010

    I tried Windsor today. Initially, I did the wrist smudge. It smelt really old-school. Like a splash cologne you'd find in a bathroom of an expensive hotel or restaurant with a guy in a suit ready to wash your hands. The citrus and pine notes heavily remind me of a combination of the Truefitt & Hill colognes. I could see it being a little cheap smelling....like a bottle of aftershave. It's got that vibe if you testing it from a vial. It's better if you spray it.

    Eventually, I did two sprays to my inner elbow and it comes off smelling a little aquatic/calone-y in the opening. A very fine fragrance, I like it a lot. A little classic, reminds me a bit of Kouros in a strange way, the overall vibe, not scent. Not much rose, but I get the pine, gin and lime a lot with cedar and eucalyptus in the background.

    It's very well blended and the quality of notes are good but aren't superb for a $600 fragrance. It would be reasonably priced in Creed's regular line-up and I wouldn't hesitate to purchase some but at that exclusive price, I'd probably wouldn't go out of my way. It's not opulent enough though defiently something I could see a Duke wearing. Refined...but I don't know if I could pull it off. I nor act or look like a Duke.
    Last edited by nsamadi; 15th May 2010 at 02:58 AM.

  29. #89
    Basenotes Institution
    mikeperez23's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Miami, FL
    Posts
    26,346

    Default Re: Creed Windsor Returns Fall 2010

    Quote Originally Posted by nsamadi View Post
    I tried Windsor today. Initially, I did the wrist smudge. It smelt really old-school. Like a splash cologne you'd find in a bathroom of an expensive hotel or restaurant with a guy in a suit ready to wash your hands. The citrus and pine notes heavily remind me of a combination of the Truefitt & Hill colognes. I could see it being a little cheap smelling....like a bottle of aftershave. It's got that vibe if you testing it from a vial. It's better if you spray it.

    Eventually, I did two sprays to my inner elbow and it comes off smelling a little aquatic/calone-y in the opening. A very fine fragrance, I like it a lot. A little classic, reminds me a bit of Kouros in a strange way, the overall vibe, not scent. Not much rose, but I get the pine, gin and lime a lot with cedar and eucalyptus in the background.

    It's very well blended and the quality of notes are good but aren't superb for a $600 fragrance. It would be reasonably priced in Creed's regular line-up and I wouldn't hesitate to purchase some but at that exclusive price, I'd probably wouldn't go out of my way. It's not opulent enough though defiently something I could see a Duke wearing. Refined...but I don't know if I could pull it off. I nor act or look like a Duke.
    I remember you were excited to try this N - glad you finally did.

    Each & every time I wore Windsor from my sample (which I finished last week) I experienced something new...it is one of those scents that takes several wearings to wrap your head around. I love the way the notes interplay with each other and yes, it has a whiff of royalty to it that kind of fits in with scents like No. 88 and/or Vintage Tabarome.
    Last edited by mikeperez23; 17th May 2010 at 03:51 AM.

Similar Threads

  1. Creed Windsor..smells like...
    By ++++ in forum Male Fragrance Discussion
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 28th January 2010, 07:23 PM
  2. The Creed Windsor Poll
    By scentsitivity in forum Male Fragrance Discussion
    Replies: 98
    Last Post: 27th January 2010, 08:19 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •