It is not a reformulation just a changing of the Davidoff logo -
Thread: ZINO davidoff in two versions? |
i wonder which zino to get - the one where 'davidoff' is printed on the bottle, or the one where it is signature like? is the first mentioned a reformulation on the scent?
It is not a reformulation just a changing of the Davidoff logo -
thanks for the response! scentimus, are you sure that the content is the same? once i made a mistake with van cleef & arpels and now i am very suspisious...
actually, it would be a blind buy... i don't have any reference, i just wondered which one is better
Don't get any, go with Cool Water instead.
I have used both versions and there is no noticeable difference. Both are Zino, i.e. fantastic.
ointments and perfume delight the heart....
#BBOG!
So what's the deal with Zino, is it definitely discontinued?
I wore both and to my nose just the same.
The only easy day was yesterday
Apparently the newer version (block letters -- which I haven't tried yet) smells good, but loses some of the depth and a lot of the longevity of the vintage (cursive letters) which is great.
Cool Water is about as different from Zino as you can get.
Huge difference. No noticeable sandalwood in the one with Davidoff in block letters. A waste of money, at least for me (I swapped mine off).
Visit my huge swap page: http://www.basenotes.net/threads/211...-ml-Gotham-etc
Or visit my Sales page: http://www.basenotes.net/threads/211...o-make-offers!
Samples, etc. for Sale at my Crystal Flacon page: http://flacon.ambaric.net/viewtopic.php?t=282
My fragrance blog: http://bigslyfragrance.wordpress.com/
I recently bought Davidoff in block letter and had to give it away, smells a bit different and hardly stays on your skin after an hour. I gave it away and currently in pursuit of Zino with cursive letters.
Beware of false advertisement - I got it from this website http://www.cosmeticsnow.co.nz/itemin...tte-spray-75ml where clearly shows the one in cursive letters but they sent me a one with block letters... so again beware!! If you planning in getting it online, I would suggest that you contact the seller first to make sure you get what you after.
I have to agree......
Despite the first hour of Zino in 'block font' still being pretty good and heavy, after max. 2/3 hrs the stuff is almost all gone and hardly detectable. I use my 125ml bottle for layering it with Heritage edt.
My Top '11' : (In no particular order)
- Dolce & Gabbana: Pour Homme (vtg)
- Paco Rabanne: pour homme (vtg)
- Armani: Acqua di Gio Profumo
- Davidoff: Leather Blend Edp
- Rasasi: Al Wisam Day
- Dior: Fahrenheit (vtg)
- YSL: Kouros (Fraîcheur)
- Mancera: Cedrat Boise
- MPG: Santal Noble
- Knize Ten
- Amouage: Interlude
A while ago i bought a 125ml bottle with the Block Font, and it smells exactly as i remembered it. Which is AWESOME!!!
First 1.5 hrs it does indeed............
My Top '11' : (In no particular order)
- Dolce & Gabbana: Pour Homme (vtg)
- Paco Rabanne: pour homme (vtg)
- Armani: Acqua di Gio Profumo
- Davidoff: Leather Blend Edp
- Rasasi: Al Wisam Day
- Dior: Fahrenheit (vtg)
- YSL: Kouros (Fraîcheur)
- Mancera: Cedrat Boise
- MPG: Santal Noble
- Knize Ten
- Amouage: Interlude
This wasn't reformulated. Have both versions. 1 oz I bought 2 or 3 years ago and just bought a 4.2 oz with the block letters last week. They're identical. Same smell, same projection, and same lasting power. If there is any difference it's so minimal that you'd have to be a profession perfume tester to smell it.
Some day's you're the statue and some days you're the pigeon.
lol, some really disagree to this statement though.........
My Top '11' : (In no particular order)
- Dolce & Gabbana: Pour Homme (vtg)
- Paco Rabanne: pour homme (vtg)
- Armani: Acqua di Gio Profumo
- Davidoff: Leather Blend Edp
- Rasasi: Al Wisam Day
- Dior: Fahrenheit (vtg)
- YSL: Kouros (Fraîcheur)
- Mancera: Cedrat Boise
- MPG: Santal Noble
- Knize Ten
- Amouage: Interlude
If anyone knows the websites where we can get the originals.. that would help!
Yes, I've put them both on at the same time and tested them. Can't tell any difference what so ever. I'm not the best on judging the individual notes, but the fragrance as a whole smell exactly the same. The only thing that might be different would be that some notes are more emphasized than others, but I have an average joe nose.
Some day's you're the statue and some days you're the pigeon.
Wore the Block Letters Zino today. I don't smell any difference with the vintage bottle.
I still smell it on me pretty good and I applied it +/- 12 hours ago...
![]()
--- If your dog thinks you are the greatest person
in the world, don't seek a second opinion ---
Wow - this block letter stuff sounds amazing! I have to seek some out! ;-)
Since they smell exactly the same, would anyone want to sell or swap their Vintage bottles?
Please PM me...I would be interested, even though the old juice might be past its expiration date.
Cheers,
ericrico
“Some perfumes are as fragrant as an infant’s flesh, sweet as an oboe’s cry, and greener than the spring; While others are triumphant, decadent or rich; Having the expansion of infinite things, like ambergris and musk, benzoin and frankincense, which sing the transports of the mind and every sense.”
― Charles Baudelaire, The Flowers of Evil & Paris Spleen
Again, I ask, why does a change in the font on a bottle automatically equal reformulation around here? Why would the companies change a small part of the packaging when they reformulate the frag?
Maybe you get a new bottle that is off or has been stored improperly so it smells different from the old one you have. Doesnt that make more sense?
Want to trade - Chanel Platinum Egoiste for Dior Eau Sauvage...
http://www.basenotes.net/threads/394...82#post3308582
I see it around, and plenty cheap. Apart from places that always seem to have major problems keeping their stock up it's not exactly hard to find, but this could be the reformulation. Personally I dig both versions, but even if the reformulation dies after a few hours the stuff is cheap, so buy an atomizer and sprits up again. Better than paying vintage prices methinks unless you can find the original through normal retail channels or have money to burn.So what's the deal with Zino, is it definitely discontinued?
Just my two cents. I totally respect it for the price and think it's Davidoff's second best ever (Cool Water isn't no.1, Davidoff is) but for me it's something of an also-ran as I've got other scents which give the same vibe, but do it better for me so I won't be rushing to stock up, and when I want classic Davidoff I reach for Davidoff by Davidoff (does Basenotes give awards for most uses of the name Davidoff in one sentance? Davidoff Davidoff Davidoff...) now when that one runs out (I've got maybe 20mls left) I'm going to panic. Zino, I'll miss him when he's gone but I won't dive in after him.
I read somewhere that Johnny Depp is a big fan of Zino.. I wonder what's his thought in all of this.. come on Johnny SAY SOMETHING
Zino is Johnny Depp's signature scent (and has been for years)...he is a man of fine taste. He is anti-Hollywood and was close friends with Hunter S. Thompson (and portrayed him in films).
I respect and admire the man - he is fantastic at his craft.
Cheers.
Last edited by ericrico; 5th September 2012 at 05:41 AM.
“Some perfumes are as fragrant as an infant’s flesh, sweet as an oboe’s cry, and greener than the spring; While others are triumphant, decadent or rich; Having the expansion of infinite things, like ambergris and musk, benzoin and frankincense, which sing the transports of the mind and every sense.”
― Charles Baudelaire, The Flowers of Evil & Paris Spleen
I'm left with a pleasant vanilla after 4 to 6 hours. There's still a little bit of the heart hanging on, but not much. Zino isn't a beast on my skin. Most every opinion on basenotes I take with a grain of salt. Either way Zino is a fantastic fragrance that deserves the debate.
Last edited by silentrich; 5th September 2012 at 12:36 AM.
Some day's you're the statue and some days you're the pigeon.
I wrote about this on my blog recently. Everyone has their own opinion, but there is also an "objective" quality as well, though that may require scientific technology (gas chromatography?). There is either the same "sandalwood" molecule content in the new version or there is not; that is not something that can be argued once it is determined. "You are entitled to your own opinion but not your own facts." The OP needs to understand that we are basing our speculations on our experiences. We did not bottle the fragrances so of course we cannot know for sure.
Visit my huge swap page: http://www.basenotes.net/threads/211...-ml-Gotham-etc
Or visit my Sales page: http://www.basenotes.net/threads/211...o-make-offers!
Samples, etc. for Sale at my Crystal Flacon page: http://flacon.ambaric.net/viewtopic.php?t=282
My fragrance blog: http://bigslyfragrance.wordpress.com/
I agree. My point is that if it was reformulated, it's damn hard to tell the difference. This isn't a daily wearer for me and it's more of a mood fragrance if truth be told. Just from some of the opinions on here it seems like this might be a case of people who love it and those that really like it. The better opinion might come from those who hate it![]()
Some day's you're the statue and some days you're the pigeon.
The sandalwood provides an effective, skillful, and pleasing "filling out" aspect to (vintage) Zino's base accord. One thing I appreciate about that accord is that the composition loses no depth as a result of it. Jaguar Mark II and Gucci Envy pH are two frags which feature sandalwood but suffer a bit of obscuration as a result -- I'm almost trying to "smell through" the sandalwood but it feels a little synthetic and opaque (despite the fact I enjoy them). I don't generally like opaque compositions. I prefer there to be a tangible "olfactory space" to a frag's structure -- not necessarily transparency (a la Ellena) but something akin to it.