Code of Conduct
Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Pennsyl-tuckey
    Posts
    1,768
    Blog Entries
    1

    Question Van Cleef & Arpels Tsar: Old formulation vs. New formulation

    No, this is not a thread comparing the two. However, that is my question - I'm wondering if there's any difference between the most recent formulation, in the "original" bottle, and the previous two formulations. I have the most recent version and it smells like a watered down Aramis Havana (although Tsar came first), and the longevity is kinda lame.
    SEEKING BOTTLES OF:

    Aramis New West (preferably old bottle)
    Patrick by Fragrances of Ireland
    Azzaro Aqua
    Gloria by Cacharel

    PM me if you have bottles that you're willing to sell or trade!

  2. #2
    kxe003's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Fayetteville, AR
    Posts
    872

    Default Re: Van Cleef & Arpels Tsar: Old formulation vs. New formulation

    Yes, the longevity is very average to me, but that is fine as Tsar is not one of my favorites anyway. Although a great fragrance nonetheless.

  3. #3
    hednic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Reside in McLean, NYC, Manuel Antonio & Búzios
    Posts
    219,063

    Default Re: Van Cleef & Arpels Tsar: Old formulation vs. New formulation

    Quote Originally Posted by kxe003 View Post
    the longevity is very average to me.
    To me also.

  4. #4
    vita odorifera
    perfaddict's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Lagos
    Posts
    10,809
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: Van Cleef & Arpels Tsar: Old formulation vs. New formulation

    The newest Tsar is okay. I have it and enjoy it, but it is not as long-lasting as the original version, which is closer to Montana's Parfum d'Homme than to Havana, i think. I wonder why the one in the ribbed bottle was even called Tsar! VC&A must have had a tongue-in-cheek moment then.

    As an aside, one way to tell the difference between original and newest verrsions is that the bottle of the new one is actually transparent, and not opaque like the original.
    ointments and perfume delight the heart....

    #BBOG!

  5. #5
    shamu1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    North Shore, Mass.
    Posts
    2,363

    Default Re: Van Cleef & Arpels Tsar: Old formulation vs. New formulation

    Quote Originally Posted by perfaddict View Post
    The newest Tsar is okay. I have it and enjoy it, but it is not as long-lasting as the original version, which is closer to Montana's Parfum d'Homme than to Havana, i think. I wonder why the one in the ribbed bottle was even called Tsar! VC&A must have had a tongue-in-cheek moment then.

    As an aside, one way to tell the difference between original and newest verrsions is that the bottle of the new one is actually transparent, and not opaque like the original.
    I agree. Smells great, but not a powerhouse like the original Tsar. I just spray on more, and reapply mid-day. No sweat.
    Check out my blog Pour Monsieur, a no-nonsense guide to men's fragrances:
    http://pourmonsieurblog.blogspot.com/

    Any fragrance that should not be worn in public, should be worn in public.

  6. #6

    Default Re: Van Cleef & Arpels Tsar: Old formulation vs. New formulation

    Dear, I already bought 03 Tsar vintage, and I was disappointed with everyone. The last one I bought even being the same as the first photo did not convince me, I discovered through the research site of the year that it was made in 2008. Then I do not know what else to do! Will I need to find only the TSAR VINTAGE of its release year so I can get all that magic again ?? Please help me!!!

  7. #7
    Basenotes Plus
    yarn's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    God's own Country - Yorkshire
    Posts
    1,776

    Default Re: Van Cleef & Arpels Tsar: Old formulation vs. New formulation

    Funny that this has cropped up as I recently made an error with a purchase of what I believed was a vintage sealed bottle. Turned out to be the clear, ribbed bottle that arrived. At this point I didn't realise that this version was one to avoid so I gave it a try and was confused as it didn't seem to resemble a single review that I had read.

    After a bit of digging and plenty of assistance from a very helpful Basenoter I realised I had the wrong thing - it had an awful curry note going on and as I said, didn't seem to resemble a single review that I had read. To be fair, the person who I bought it off has taken it back but he insisted it was the original formula which I believe to not be the case
    Currently wearing: Bois du Portugal by Creed

Similar Threads

  1. What formulation is this Gentleman??
    By Hasupk@gmail.com in forum Male Fragrance Discussion
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 2nd March 2009, 08:00 PM
  2. The new Pour Homme Van Cleef & Arpels and Tsar or is it?
    By scentimus in forum Male Fragrance Discussion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 29th August 2008, 02:40 PM
  3. Old formulation Ungaro III
    By aljinnie in forum Male Fragrance Discussion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 24th February 2008, 08:49 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  



Loving perfume on the Internet since 2000