Code of Conduct
Results 1 to 52 of 52
  1. #1

    Default Is Longevity BS?

    I've read and watched tonnes of reviews on fragrances where people go on about 4-12+ hours of longevity.
    I've never come across a perfume that lasts more than 2-3 hours. I know people have different skin types but really? How many people actually get 4-12+ hours of longevity cause I think it's kind of BS.

  2. #2

    Default Re: Is Longevity BS?

    i agree to an extent. I have very dry skin and longevity is a big factor for me. Fragrances that give me 10+ hours

    andy tauer - lair du desert maurocain
    amouage - epic man, silver man, opus 3, jubilation vvx
    dior - fahrenheit
    montale - all that i have tried so far
    guerlain - spiriteuese double vanille
    frederic malle - musc ravageur
    jpg - le male
    thierry mugler - all a-men's


    fragrances that last less than 3 hours:


    aqua di parma - cipresso di toscana
    hermes - hermesscence line
    creed - virgin island water lasts literally 20 minutes, literally
    mazzolari - marina

  3. #3

    Default Re: Is Longevity BS?

    I have problem with that too but I don't get 2-3 hours. For example Le male lasts 10 hours on me. It's not bad but people get more than that. Or they say a*men last 12-24 hours but I get around 10. If you have never had more then 2-3 hours of longevity, then you may have some problem with your body chemistry. I mean it's just an opinion of mine. You might be fine with the chemistry.

  4. #4

    Default Re: Is Longevity BS?

    Quote Originally Posted by john916 View Post
    i agree to an extent. I have very dry skin and longevity is a big factor for me. Fragrances that give me 10+ hours
    I live in London and I usually smell quite a few scents on the way to work in the morning. However I rarely ever smell village from anyone on my way back. I use the tube (subway).

  5. #5

    Default Re: Is Longevity BS?

    Quote Originally Posted by esato-1 View Post
    I have problem with that too but I don't get 2-3 hours. For example Le male lasts 10 hours on me.
    Can I ask how you know a fragrance lasts 10 hours on you? I stop smelling any scent I've applied after an hour and a half unless I hold my nose close and sniff really hard.

  6. #6

    Default Re: Is Longevity BS?

    Quote Originally Posted by Litefooted View Post
    Can I ask how you know a fragrance lasts 10 hours on you? I stop smelling any scent I've applied after an hour and a half unless I hold my nose close and sniff really hard.
    Le male projects very well on me for 5-6 hours. So I don't really have to hold my nose close to sniff. Afeter 5 hours it stars to calm down but I can still smell it when I want to. Le male is amazsing about that. I think you can get at least 6-8 hours with that. Did you try le male?

  7. #7

    Default Re: Is Longevity BS?

    I certainly can get far more than 2-3 hours of longevity with some fragrances I own; on the other hand, I get less than 2 hours with a few of the citrus-based ones. I think it's an important issue and appreciate hearing other Basenoters' experiences with various frags...it's a very legitimate concern when one considers paying several hundred dollars/pounds/euros for a fragrance.

  8. #8

    Default Re: Is Longevity BS?

    No, it's not BS at all. Some fragrances simply last longer and/or project more than others. There are lots of factors, both actual and perceived, that factor into how long a scent is perceptible on a person.

  9. #9

    Default Re: Is Longevity BS?

    No by the time I really got into fragrances Le Male was extremely common and it smells just okay to me.

  10. #10

    Default Re: Is Longevity BS?

    Quote Originally Posted by cologne connoisseur View Post
    I think it's an important issue and appreciate hearing other Basenoters' experiences with various frags...it's a very legitimate concern when one considers paying several hundred dollars/pounds/euros for a fragrance.
    Same

  11. #11
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    596

    Default Re: Is Longevity BS?

    Longevity IS BS - but not in the way the OP means. To answer the OPs concerns, I would suggest that you may be experiencing some olfactory fatigue when you wear a fragrance and although you can't smell it on yourself other people would be able to smell it on you (if they're close enough). When I go on long drives I like to sample something different on each wrist, checking it's development every so often. Doing this has showed me that perfumes really do last several hours on the skin, including those perfumes I couldn't smell on myself when I was wearing them.

    What is BS is the notion that longevity is someone a benchmark of a fragrance's quality - it isn't. First of all, there are plenty of people that do not want a perfume to last all day. For example my father likes to use a citrus cologne out of the shower as part of his morning ritual but doesn't want to smell like fragrance all day at work.

    Second, if one samples vintage perfumes you realize that they do not last nearly as long as today's perfumes. This is most likely because of the ingredients they employed. Today's aromachemical laden perfumes are capable of lasting much longer on the skin because the chemicals' molecules break down more slowly. A perfume lasting a long time does not mean it's of higher quality, and it doesn't necessarily mean it's more potent - it just means it contains longer-acting aromachemicals. All-natural/organic perfumes tend to have less longevity for this reason, and this doesn't mean they are of poor quality at all.

    Finally, it's the easiest thing to reapply one's fragrance. They used to make parfums in purse-sizes for this reason, and today one can decant into an atomizer. As people once did (when vintage perfumes weren't vintage), just reapply if you want to freshen up your perfume. Plus how long does one really need a fragrance to last? If I'm going out at night for dinner and drinks then 4-5 hours is more then enough... do I really care if my fragrance is still going at 3am?

    As with any note or accord, longevity is simply one aspect of a fragrance to like/dislike. I frequently see people write things like "this is a good fragrance except it doesn't last [x hours]" or "at this price a fragrance should last [x hours]." Obviously each individual can decide what they like/dislike in a perfume, but tying a perfume's quality or value into it's longevity is a fallacy.

  12. #12

    Default Re: Is Longevity BS?

    Quote Originally Posted by nineXseven View Post
    Longevity IS BS - but not in the way the OP means. To answer the OPs concerns, I would suggest that you may be experiencing some olfactory fatigue when you wear a fragrance and although you can't smell it on yourself other people would be able to smell it on you (if they're close enough). When I go on long drives I like to sample something different on each wrist, checking it's development every so often. Doing this has showed me that perfumes really do last several hours on the skin, including those perfumes I couldn't smell on myself when I was wearing them.

    What is BS is the notion that longevity is someone a benchmark of a fragrance's quality - it isn't. First of all, there are plenty of people that do not want a perfume to last all day. For example my father likes to use a citrus cologne out of the shower as part of his morning ritual but doesn't want to smell like fragrance all day at work.

    Second, if one samples vintage perfumes you realize that they do not last nearly as long as today's perfumes. This is most likely because of the ingredients they employed. Today's aromachemical laden perfumes are capable of lasting much longer on the skin because the chemicals' molecules break down more slowly. A perfume lasting a long time does not mean it's of higher quality, and it doesn't necessarily mean it's more potent - it just means it contains longer-acting aromachemicals. All-natural/organic perfumes tend to have less longevity for this reason, and this doesn't mean they are of poor quality at all.

    Finally, it's the easiest thing to reapply one's fragrance. They used to make parfums in purse-sizes for this reason, and today one can decant into an atomizer. As people once did (when vintage perfumes weren't vintage), just reapply if you want to freshen up your perfume. Plus how long does one really need a fragrance to last? If I'm going out at night for dinner and drinks then 4-5 hours is more then enough... do I really care if my fragrance is still going at 3am?

    As with any note or accord, longevity is simply one aspect of a fragrance to like/dislike. I frequently see people write things like "this is a good fragrance except it doesn't last [x hours]" or "at this price a fragrance should last [x hours]." Obviously each individual can decide what they like/dislike in a perfume, but tying a perfume's quality or value into it's longevity is a fallacy.
    I don't think it's fatigue. I try new fragrances all the time but the smell vanishes after 3 hours. I do agree that longevity isn't a mark of quality but there are people who work long hours and would like to continuously smell pleasant. I do have an Atomizer but I'd like to re-apply less often.

  13. #13
    My_pep_pep's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Cincinnati
    Posts
    492
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default Re: Is Longevity BS?

    I wore Gucci Nobile to work today, and it lasted all day. About 3 hours after applying, it kept reminding me of Eau de Guerlain. Then later it went back to how it smelled when first applied. I don't know if other people could smell it, but I usually wear lightly anyway. Made me think....I should just test 1 scent per day, all day, to see what it does. But who has the patience to do that.

    Frank Los Angeles 2 lasts for freakin' ever!

    Edit to clarify: both of these last well into the 8 or 9 hour mark.

  14. #14
    Al Gae's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    640

    Default Re: Is Longevity BS?

    nineXseven had a nice post - to add to it a bit, you'll find that here on Basenotes people also define longevity differently. There are some who consider a fragrance's longevity to be the amount of time that you can smell its sillage - i.e. you don't have to smell your skin directly to detect the fragrance. Others consider it to be the amount of time you can detect the fragrance when smelling right where you applied it. So, for some fragrances the sillage dies down significantly after a few hours, but you can still smell the frag if you sniff your application point. Personally, I define it as the amount of time I can smell the fragrance on my skin, so I may report longer longevity than someone who assumes the frag has worn off when you can't smell it around you anymore.

  15. #15

    Default Re: Is Longevity BS?

    I just completely agree with nineXseven.

  16. #16
    silentrich's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Fort Myers, FL
    Posts
    4,902

    Default Re: Is Longevity BS?

    Quote Originally Posted by sarıpatates View Post
    I just completely agree with nineXseven.
    +1. I can only detect the strongest fragrances 4 to 5 hours on me and after that I smell little if nothing at all. For me I know it's olfactory fatigue. Just yesterday I sprayed Dior Homme Sport on my wrist. After smelling it everything I put on smelled like pepper. I sprayed the other wrist 4 hours later with DHS and couldn't detect any notes except alcohol. I think the problem was that I sprayed a fragrance twice on my neck which dulled my senses.

  17. #17
    silentrich's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Fort Myers, FL
    Posts
    4,902

    Default Re: Is Longevity BS?

    Quote Originally Posted by sarıpatates View Post
    I just completely agree with nineXseven.
    +1. I can only detect the strongest fragrances 4 to 5 hours on me and after that I smell little if nothing at all. For me I know it's olfactory fatigue. Just yesterday I sprayed Dior Homme Sport on my wrist. After smelling it everything I put on smelled like pepper. I sprayed the other wrist 4 hours later with DHS and couldn't detect any notes except alcohol. I think the problem was that I sprayed a fragrance twice on my neck which dulled my senses.

  18. #18

    Default Re: Is Longevity BS?

    Quote Originally Posted by nineXseven View Post
    Longevity IS BS - but not in the way the OP means. To answer the OPs concerns, I would suggest that you may be experiencing some olfactory fatigue when you wear a fragrance and although you can't smell it on yourself other people would be able to smell it on you (if they're close enough). When I go on long drives I like to sample something different on each wrist, checking it's development every so often. Doing this has showed me that perfumes really do last several hours on the skin, including those perfumes I couldn't smell on myself when I was wearing them.

    What is BS is the notion that longevity is someone a benchmark of a fragrance's quality - it isn't. First of all, there are plenty of people that do not want a perfume to last all day. For example my father likes to use a citrus cologne out of the shower as part of his morning ritual but doesn't want to smell like fragrance all day at work.

    Second, if one samples vintage perfumes you realize that they do not last nearly as long as today's perfumes. This is most likely because of the ingredients they employed. Today's aromachemical laden perfumes are capable of lasting much longer on the skin because the chemicals' molecules break down more slowly. A perfume lasting a long time does not mean it's of higher quality, and it doesn't necessarily mean it's more potent - it just means it contains longer-acting aromachemicals. All-natural/organic perfumes tend to have less longevity for this reason, and this doesn't mean they are of poor quality at all.

    Finally, it's the easiest thing to reapply one's fragrance. They used to make parfums in purse-sizes for this reason, and today one can decant into an atomizer. As people once did (when vintage perfumes weren't vintage), just reapply if you want to freshen up your perfume. Plus how long does one really need a fragrance to last? If I'm going out at night for dinner and drinks then 4-5 hours is more then enough... do I really care if my fragrance is still going at 3am?

    As with any note or accord, longevity is simply one aspect of a fragrance to like/dislike. I frequently see people write things like "this is a good fragrance except it doesn't last [x hours]" or "at this price a fragrance should last [x hours]." Obviously each individual can decide what they like/dislike in a perfume, but tying a perfume's quality or value into it's longevity is a fallacy.
    Interesting comments here. I agree with you all the way to the end EXCEPT up to the last sentence. There's nothing wrong with equating the "value" of the fragrance with it's longevity, especially if thats what you think is most important or valuable about a scent. We all place different values on on things and that's why some drive Honda's and others drive Escalades. If you asked me which is more valuable, we would all agree that the world's conception of value would say the Escalade is "worth" more. But as a poor graduate student, an Escalade is of little value to me, unless I can sell it. A Honda would be much more valuable. That being said, many here like myself need to know that we've spent money on something we can enjoy for more than a few hours per spray. If one places a high value on economy, then so be it.
    Spring/Summer Rotation:

    Versace Pour Homme
    Kenzo Pour Homme (vintage)
    Dolce & Gabbana Pour Homme (vintage)
    D& G Masculine
    Christian Dior Dune
    Guerlain Homme (EDT)
    Bond No9 Riverside Drive

    If smelling good was a crime, I'd be serving a lifetime sentence....

    - OE (olfactoryexperience)

  19. #19
    Pollux's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    http://goo.gl/1zgdDl
    Posts
    3,615

    Default Re: Is Longevity BS?

    NineXSeven is right, it might and it might not: on the one hand, it depends on the concentration of EOs in the carrier, the EO's and the fixatives used, and, on the other hand, on one's reaction to the blend. Take JPG's le Male and Fleur du Male, they have outstanding longevity even in persons for which this is an issue - that is me. Of course, even though it is good, it might not be as good as in someone with a skin that would assure better longevity than mine. Why? Orientals are longer lasting than citric blends, add to this skin chemistry - the specific weight of molecules are related to longevity. Thus, citric eo's have less longevity than woody and spicy eos.

    Now, manufacturers are aware of this and are making efforts in order to satisfy consumer's expectations... and here is when things might go awry, for this demands the use of synthetics, not a bad thing per se, but sometimes the reason why blends might feel "tingy" to the nose, or metalic, or plainly said by many, "synthetic". So, take an Eau de Cologne in composition with the longevity of an EdT, the ones I tried did not feel good, IMHO. Or good quality classic-style EdCs that are criticised for their lack of longevity, analogous to asking a strawberry to taste like a banana.

    So, the point is you will have to search for those working for you based on the occasion. Sometimes situations call for an EdC, sometimes you will want to (and might as well can) wear an EdT, an EdPs, a parfum or an extrait, so this is up to you, your tastes and the occasion.

    The best of all? Just try before you buy.

  20. #20
    Hob Dobson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    South Florida
    Posts
    1,107

    Default Re: Is Longevity BS?

    Quote Originally Posted by Litefooted View Post
    I've read and watched tonnes of reviews on fragrances where people go on about 4-12+ hours of longevity.
    I've never come across a perfume that lasts more than 2-3 hours. I know people have different skin types but really? How many people actually get 4-12+ hours of longevity cause I think it's kind of BS.
    If you thought that we meant the fragrance was still just as strong and strongly projecting after 4-12+ hours as when it was first applied, you're completely mistaken. In most cases, we're only putting on a finite amount of diluted aromachemicals, which are continually removed by evaporation, absorption, diffusion, and bacterial metabolism. That's even without considering olfactory fatigue and anosmia.

    Sure, it's faint now (to me anyway), but a quick sniff at the collar of my undershirt confirms that I put on MPG's Centaure 13 hours ago. If I'd worn Knize Ten, Knize Two, Habanita, or Quorum, I could leave the shirt in the laundry pile and still recognize the fragrance from the smell of the shirt tomorrow.

    If I wore one of even these heavy hitters every day I'd soon have a lot of trouble noticing the scent in drydown as my nose adjusted. People around me might have a much different experience. For both reasons, I find it a good practice to not wear the same thing two days in a row.

  21. #21
    silentrich's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Fort Myers, FL
    Posts
    4,902

    Default Re: Is Longevity BS?

    I think 4-6 hours is fine for longevity. In all reality how many times do you need anything past that amount of time? I can go out to dinner and see a movie in that time, visit friends and family in that time, go have drinks in that time, and if your in school will be done with classes by that time. Who cares if it lasts at work because all we think about is getting off anyways.

  22. #22
    Renato's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    11,685

    Default Objective Evidence

    Quote Originally Posted by Litefooted View Post
    I've read and watched tonnes of reviews on fragrances where people go on about 4-12+ hours of longevity.
    I've never come across a perfume that lasts more than 2-3 hours. I know people have different skin types but really? How many people actually get 4-12+ hours of longevity cause I think it's kind of BS.
    There is no need to rely on our assertions with respect to longevity. Here is a test you can do at home.

    Get two jumpers or cardigans. Spray some scent on their inside, near the underarm area, then leave the jumpers out in the open on a bed or something.

    If you spray Joop Homme, you will still smell it there 12 days later.
    If you spray, Aramis, Lagerfeld Photo, Boss 6 or Eternity under the other underarm area, you will still smell it there four to five days later.
    More typical scents may hang around for a day or two.
    If you spray Eau Sauvage or YSL PH, it will essentially be gone in around 4 hours.

    Plainly, people's skins will kill off scents a bit quicker than when the scent is in clothes. But the long lasting ones will last longer regardless of whether they're on skin or clothes.
    And most people who apply scent do so when wearing clothes, so the scent is on both clothes and skin.

    But that is not always the case. I've worn scents like Joop Hoome and Gucci Rush to the beach, and after 7 hours of going in and out of water, they still hung around with some strength on my skin (although, admittedly most wash off pretty quickly in sea water).
    Regards,
    Renato

  23. #23
    Hob Dobson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    South Florida
    Posts
    1,107

    Default Re: Is Longevity BS?

    Quote Originally Posted by nineXseven View Post
    Plus how long does one really need a fragrance to last? If I'm going out at night for dinner and drinks then 4-5 hours is more then enough... do I really care if my fragrance is still going at 3am?
    One of the things I like about Xeryus is that I can put it on before going to work, work a full day, and it's in a quiet but surprisingly good-smelling drydown during an after-dinner tabletop RPG session with friends. Enough wafts up from under the collar that I can enjoy it, but I'm relatively sure it's not strong enough to bother others at the table. I could reapply for stronger effect, but lose some of the character ... and I just don't like artemisia *that* much.

    For a nice evening dinner, I think I'd want something shorter-lived for the daytime before, and make sure that what I use in the evening can be settled down before the food is served. Yet ... Knize Ten is so very nice to wake up to.

    One of the fun things about CdG Tar is that on a hot day it completely falls apart after a few hours. What's left is a bit more posh (almost cloyingly so) than I think was called for in the original brief. Since I enjoy the before/after incongruity, is the limited longevity a real problem?

    All in all, I'd say the important thing for longevity is that what you get lasts long enough for what you want it for, and that you still want it for as long you're stuck with it.

  24. #24

    Default Re: Is Longevity BS?

    The scent goes on after the projection becomes less apparent. Some seem to turn on and off on me, too. Drydown is a key part of longevity. Some just dry down better than others.
    "Strange things are afoot. I am one of them and I am up to another." -*^-'._.'-^*- - S.B.

  25. #25
    hednic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    McLean, NYC, & Búzios
    Posts
    102,028

    Default Re: Is Longevity BS?

    Quote Originally Posted by A. Homme View Post
    No, it's not BS at all. Some fragrances simply last longer and/or project more than others. There are lots of factors, both actual and perceived, that factor into how long a scent is perceptible on a person.
    Absolutely agree.

  26. #26
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    596

    Default Re: Is Longevity BS?

    Nice to see a good discussion about what different people value regarding longevity, which confirms my theory that people value longevity differently.

    Interesting comments here. I agree with you all the way to the end EXCEPT up to the last sentence. There's nothing wrong with equating the "value" of the fragrance with it's longevity, especially if thats what you think is most important or valuable about a scent.
    I agree that we all have our own subjective criteria for how we value a fragrance and what we want in a fragrance. What I'm referring to are the comments along the lines of "for a fragrance that costs $[x] the longevity should be greater", thereby implying that a fragrance is somehow less good, or should be worth less, if it has less longevity. Everyone should - and will - buy what they value but also simultaneously acknowledge that longevity doesn't make a fragrance any 'better' then the would the inclusion of a note or accord. You wouldn't say "for a fragrance that costs $[x] it should contain vanilla (or whatever note)" - a fragrance it what it is. Plus I would encourage people who highly value longevity to focus more on the artistry of the composition itself and worry less about longevity. For example I enjoy Jicky more then nearly any other fragrance in existence but it will NOT last more then 2 hours on my skin, no matter how much, or what concentration, I apply. This doesn't make it bad or worth less, this is just what Jicky is.

    Excellent point someone made above about the difference between how long sillage lasts vs. how long a perfume lingers on the skin closely. When I wrist-sample perfumes at work or while taking long car trips I'm always surprised how long a perfume on my wrist is noticeable. I probably wouldn't notice many of these perfumes coming off my neck, but the skin on my wrist is still very much scented for many hours.

    Consider this anectode: a few years back a college buddy of mine visited for the weekend. Before we went out for the day my friend took one of my more subtle fragrances and gave himself two sprays on the neck. Hours later he told me he had to find a place to wash up because he couldn't take the aroma wafting off his neck anymore. I couldn't smell a darn thing coming off of him, even though we were in a car. I wouldn't discount the extent to which those of us who are constantly sampling perfume have olfactory senses that tune out constant, ongoing aromas.

  27. #27

    Default Re: Objective Evidence

    Quote Originally Posted by Renato View Post
    There is no need to rely on our assertions with respect to longevity. Here is a test you can do at home.

    Get two jumpers or cardigans. Spray some scent on their inside, near the underarm area, then leave the jumpers out in the open on a bed or something.

    If you spray Joop Homme, you will still smell it there 12 days later.
    Too true! I have a few sweaters from the mid 1990s stored in my parents basement; they still smell faintly of Joop!.

    Not counting Joop! I've found By Kilian's A Taste of Heaven and Caron Pour un Homme to have the best longevity of all my scents (and they happen to smell almost exactly the same). A Taste of Heaven lasted handsomely through an entire day of flying and wandering around airports, and it was still projecting fairly well when I went to bed at midnight.

  28. #28
    Renato's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    11,685

    Default Re: Objective Evidence

    Quote Originally Posted by Gilgamesh2003 View Post
    Too true! I have a few sweaters from the mid 1990s stored in my parents basement; they still smell faintly of Joop!.

    Not counting Joop! I've found By Kilian's A Taste of Heaven and Caron Pour un Homme to have the best longevity of all my scents (and they happen to smell almost exactly the same). A Taste of Heaven lasted handsomely through an entire day of flying and wandering around airports, and it was still projecting fairly well when I went to bed at midnight.
    Joop lasting from the mid 90s! I would like to replicate that test, but if I start now I'd have to wait till 2026.

    I forgot to mention in my earlier post that when my wife machine washes my shirts, usually they come back smelling nice and clean from all the hot water and detergent. But I've had a few shirts go through the machine wash and after ironing noticing that they still smell strongly of some scents.

    I haven't tried Killian, but agree Caron is very good longevity wise.

    In these discussions about longevity, and people who say one doesn't need it, I subscribe to the notion that if something smells good, I want it to smell good for as long as possible, not for as short as possible. For example, 4711 is a great smelling scent, but given that it lasts somewhere between 5 and ten minutes on most people, I don't see the point of it - other than for smelling great while one uses it to clean eye glasses.
    Regards,
    Renato

  29. #29
    Dependent pluran's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Pacific Northwest
    Posts
    7,214

    Default Re: Is Longevity BS?

    These constant lasting power threads always have me thinking there must be something else going in relation to male performance.

    Most fragrances have a lot better longevity than the average review indicates, and any perfumer will tell you that you have to learn to smell. Fragrances can easily last for twenty four hours or more, especially those with the appropriate amount of animalic ingedients.
    Last edited by pluran; 4th May 2011 at 06:25 AM.

  30. #30
    vita odorifera
    perfaddict's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Lagos
    Posts
    7,779
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: Is Longevity BS?

    Longevity is what it is, and it seems like perception of it differs from from nose to nose. That would be obvious from the seemingly conflicting assessments in the reviews here. Longevity is important to some, like me, but not to others. Personally, great quality with little longevity is a no-no. Appreciating a fragrance while wearing it fully, for as long as possible, is more important than just acknowledging the quality of its blending, the dynamics of it's notes/accords, etc, etc. Sweeping statements as to the relevance or otherwise of longevity therefore do not add much value in a fragrance-appreciation forum like this. Know what is important to you and pursue it, enjoyably.
    ointments and perfume delight the heart....

    #BBOG!

  31. #31
    StylinLA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    4,352

    Default Re: Is Longevity BS?

    I have some scents that go 12 hours. It's not BS.

    If you want to argue they are fairly mild as compared to the first couple of hours, that's a different matter. But I have plenty of scents that last a good 8 hours.

  32. #32
    teardrop's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    The south of England
    Posts
    6,754
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default Re: Is Longevity BS?

    Quote Originally Posted by Litefooted View Post
    I don't think it's fatigue. I try new fragrances all the time but the smell vanishes after 3 hours. I do agree that longevity isn't a mark of quality but there are people who work long hours and would like to continuously smell pleasant. I do have an Atomizer but I'd like to re-apply less often.
    l agree. l work long shifts in a hospital & as you can imagine, there are all kinds of other smells going on there which can make you feel less than fresh. l like to feel fresh & fragrant all day without the inconvenience of having to re-apply, but l find very few fragrances achieve this. Plus re-applying means you're hitting everyone with the topnotes which can be too strong; it's more pleasant for everyone else if it's the drydown they can smell on you.
    For me, most fragrances last somewhere between 4-6 hours. Anything more than that is outstanding; my record is 10 hours with Caron's Acaciosa, which was astonishing to me! The Montales also have great longevity, but they are too strong & "special" for work, l save them for going out.
    "What is this secret connection between the soul, and sea, clouds and perfumes? The soul itself appears to be sea, cloud and perfume..." - from Zorba the Greek by Nikos Kazantzakis.

  33. #33
    teardrop's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    The south of England
    Posts
    6,754
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default Re: Is Longevity BS?

    Quote Originally Posted by pluran View Post
    These constant lasting power threads always have me thinking there must be something else going in relation to male performance.
    Lol. Nope, it's an issue for us ladies too, l assure you!
    "What is this secret connection between the soul, and sea, clouds and perfumes? The soul itself appears to be sea, cloud and perfume..." - from Zorba the Greek by Nikos Kazantzakis.

  34. #34

    Default Re: Is Longevity BS?

    Quote Originally Posted by pluran View Post

    Most fragrances have a lot better longevity than the average review indicates, and any perfumer will tell you that you have to learn to smell. Fragrances can easily last for twenty four hours or more, especially those with the appropriate amount of animalic ingedients.
    I agree wholeheartedly!

  35. #35

    Default Re: Is Longevity BS?

    Litefooted, it's definately not BS. I wore A*Men yesterday and it was still going strong 15 hours later.
    I've had fragrances last anywhere from an hour to all day - it depends on the fragrance, your skin, the weather, your body temp and how much you sweat.
    What fragrances have you tried? Maybe we can suggest some particularly long lasting ones for you to try.
    Or it could just be that fragrances just don't last as long on your skin - not a bad situation if you want to be able to experience multiple fragrances each day.

  36. #36

    Default Re: Is Longevity BS?

    Well, some say time is a relative concept so you might be onto something here.

  37. #37

    Default Re: Is Longevity BS?

    To me i think those reviewers should make "projection longevity" subject to differentiate "close to skin longevity".

  38. #38
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    596

    Default Re: Objective Evidence

    Quote Originally Posted by Renato View Post
    There is no need to rely on our assertions with respect to longevity. Here is a test you can do at home.

    Get two jumpers or cardigans. Spray some scent on their inside, near the underarm area, then leave the jumpers out in the open on a bed or something.

    If you spray Joop Homme, you will still smell it there 12 days later.
    If you spray, Aramis, Lagerfeld Photo, Boss 6 or Eternity under the other underarm area, you will still smell it there four to five days later.
    More typical scents may hang around for a day or two.
    If you spray Eau Sauvage or YSL PH, it will essentially be gone in around 4 hours.

    Plainly, people's skins will kill off scents a bit quicker than when the scent is in clothes. But the long lasting ones will last longer regardless of whether they're on skin or clothes.
    And most people who apply scent do so when wearing clothes, so the scent is on both clothes and skin.

    But that is not always the case. I've worn scents like Joop Hoome and Gucci Rush to the beach, and after 7 hours of going in and out of water, they still hung around with some strength on my skin (although, admittedly most wash off pretty quickly in sea water).
    Regards,
    Renato
    Although a test on clothing will give indication of relative longevity, the variable of skin condition can play a big role in longevity as well. Skin oils/dryness, sweating, temperature, etc. can all effect longevity of perfume on the skin.

  39. #39
    SmellChaser
    scentsitivity's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    5,746
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: Is Longevity BS?

    Longevity is not BS.

  40. #40
    Renato's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    11,685

    Default Re: Objective Evidence

    Quote Originally Posted by nineXseven View Post
    Although a test on clothing will give indication of relative longevity, the variable of skin condition can play a big role in longevity as well. Skin oils/dryness, sweating, temperature, etc. can all effect longevity of perfume on the skin.
    I don't disagree. But for people who wear scent under clothes, that has to be a factor as well - especially if they have scent destroying skin.

    I usually test scents on my wrist or back of hands. If a scent is still there with some strength after three hours, I know it will last at least a full working day.

    If it's getting pretty weak at the three hour mark, I know it will probably be good for 5 hours under clothes.

    If it disappears before 2 hours, I know it will be good for 3 to 4 hours under clothes.
    Regards,
    Renato

  41. #41

    Default Re: Is Longevity BS?

    You don't read about this much on the men's boards but some women talk about how their skin 'eats perfume'. Maybe?
    '...And you'll carry me down on your dancing
    To the pools that you lift on your wrist...'

  42. #42

    Default Re: Is Longevity BS?

    I could be wrong, (I'm not reading most the forum posts here.. in a hurry) but, it sounds to me, your problem is more on the projection as opposed to longevity. Longevity is simply how long the fragrance lasts for, not necessarily how long you can smell it in the air for. Most fragrances don't project too well past the 3-4 hour mark. It's simply the science. Fragrances weren't meant to do this. They project in their top notes the most, and the heart/mid notes to an extent. The base is what you're left with, and the base is what lasts the longest.. but more times than none, the base notes won't project very much. So to the untrained nose, they may seem.. non-existent.

  43. #43
    Frag Bomb Squadron XIII
    Diamondflame's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    7,405

    Default Re: Is Longevity BS?

    'longevity' is not BS but a lot depends on your expectations & your own definition of 'longevity'. I wholeheartedly agree with nineXseven's viewpoint as that is exactly how I approach fragrance appreciation. An F1 machine is built for speed but I doubt if it's as comfortable a ride as a 7 series BMW. Similarly we shouldn't expect a light EDC-styled frag to last as long as a heavy oriental. Without an appreciation of the various genres of fragrance, or some rudimentary understanding of fragrance construction, there is often a tendency to get all hung up over a fragrance's 'lasting power' as an objective measure of quality. imho THAT is the real BS.

    Is a fading sunset any less beautiful than a cloudless bright blue sky?

  44. #44
    Basenotes Plus

    JaimeB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    San Francisco, California
    Posts
    5,432
    Blog Entries
    148

    Default Re: Is Longevity BS?

    About your experience on the Tube smelling a lot of people wearing fragrance in the morning, but not detecting much on going back after work:

    1. Eight hours is a long time for most fragrances to last with anything like the strength of the opening phase.
    2. Olfactory fatigue ought never to be discounted with respect to one's own scent; but if you are around other people wearing it, you can also become anosmic to theirs. You only re-register other people's scents when you change environments.
    3. Many people now seem to be trending to lighter scents, whose base notes are not so prominent as those with greater longevity.
    4. Many people are sparing in the amount of scent they wear, either because they want a bottle to last them longer, or because some people at their workplace complain about the strength of their perfume.
    5. It is entirely possible that you are relatively anosmic to common base notes. Many people seem to have a lower scent threshold for the most common top notes (citrus and some aquatic notes).
    6. Many people buy fragrances a few minutes after first testing them. Perfumers know this, and nowadays exploit it by putting the "punch" up top.
    7. It may be a matter of environmental temperature. If it's chillier in the evening than in the morning, bear in mind that scents can't be expected to diffuse as efficiently in cooler temperatures as they do in warmer ones.


    As for me personally, I usually spray under my shirt, and when I come home and take off my coat, I catch quite a good whiff of what I put on at the beginning if the day, even though I may not have been smelling it much while I still had my coat on.

    A final word: If you're dissatisfied with longevity, don't buy eaux de cologne or eaux de toilette; buy eaux de parfum instead. They are made with a higher proportion of base notes and generally seem to last longer.
    Yr good bud,

    JaimeB

    "Why spend life seeking that which does not satisfy? Why remain a slave, when freedom waits? Let your life shine; illumine the world with your truth!"

    My Wardrobe
    My Reviews

    Fiat justitia ruat cćlum.

    Let justice be done, even if the sky should fall.

    Lucius Calpurnius Piso Caesoninus

    Qui nihil potest sperare, desperet nihil.
    Let him who can hope for nothing despair of nothing.

    Male irato ferrum committitur.
    It is an evil thing to arm an angry man.
    —Seneca

  45. #45

    Default Re: Is Longevity BS?

    It has to do with notes too, not only concentration. I don't think it's possible to make citrus or bergamot last 10 hours (unless it is some sort of special chemical substitute), unlike coumarin or amber that can easily last 10+ hours, even in EDT concentration.

    And I like the idea that not all the notes have the same longevity. It's precisely what makes some fragrances changing throughout the day.

  46. #46

    Default Re: Is Longevity BS?

    In my strictly personal opinion, not as much BS, far more an effect of highly subjective perceptions

  47. #47

    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Knoxville, TN
    Posts
    1,419

    Default Re: Is Longevity BS?

    It's definitely a matter of BS for me. Personally, I have extremely dry skin, so no fragrance lasts more than a couple of hours on my skin. That's why I ALWAYS spray my scents on my clothes as well. I put fragrances under my shirt on my chest & also on the sleeves of my shirts. Now I know some say not to put scents on clothes, but I totally disagree. Putting them on my clothes always makes them last for hours, plus, it preserves & holds onto the topnotes (which, let's face it, are always the best part to me. But, I do tend to prefer linear scents though).

    Anyway, if you have dry skin like me, or you want to stop the drydown & hold onto the topnotes, I definitely recommend spritzing fragrances on your clothes.

  48. #48

    Default Re: Is Longevity BS?

    I think with time you will see that many of these frags do indeed last for 10, 12, or 16 hours, and that your average frag lasts 4 to 6.

    For some reason, when I first got into frags I had the same issue. Even the most powerful ones I could only detect for 2 or 3 hours, so I thought folks were b.sing about their longevity.

    But now, after collecting and wearing for close to a year, I see the longevity is real.

    I think it has to do with olfactory fatigue and the inexperienced nose, and as you gain more experience, your nose doesn't become as tired as quickly. Maybe with time you'll experience greater longevity as well.

  49. #49

    Default Re: Is Longevity BS?

    seems to me, litefooted should try Joop Homme since that is the legend of longetivity. If he is having a problem with that lasting on his skin, then that would be surprise!

  50. #50

    Default Re: Is Longevity BS?

    Sometimes listening to people whine about longevity is like enduring a blind man who insists that everyone is invisible.

  51. #51
    Emlynevermore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    upstate New York
    Posts
    1,211

    Default Re: Is Longevity BS?

    You're not wrong but come on, give the guy a break.

    It's a legitimate question, and the resulting discussion has been interesting enough.

    Anyway, I agree that it is important to define what fragrance "longevity" means and to consider the factors that might affect the way someone perceives it.

    Longevity is what it is, and wishing otherwise--moisturing prior to spraying, applying further away from the nose, spraying on clothes--can only go so far. Luckily, with few exceptions, you can always (shower and) reapply if you need/want to.

  52. #52

    Default Re: Is Longevity BS?

    Quote Originally Posted by teardrop View Post
    ... re-applying means you're hitting everyone with the topnotes which can be too strong; it's more pleasant for everyone else if it's the drydown they can smell on you....
    teardrop brings up a valid point. There are some fragrances I think I should put on half an hour or more before I leave the house, because the top (& perhaps some heart) notes seem almost offensive, although I love the base. Azzaro pH, and even more so, Michael Kors, are that way for me.

    All this leads me to a different thought: which more linear fragrances might one consider for those concerned with longevity/re-application?

    Finally, for some reason, I had thought for years that ambergris was important for longevity in a scent. Has the increasing implementation of synthetics (not to mention governmental regulations) changed that?

Similar Threads

  1. About OtB Longevity
    By blackened in forum Male Fragrance Discussion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11th June 2010, 12:27 PM
  2. Longevity
    By bbobkc in forum Just Starting Out
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 18th March 2007, 11:24 PM
  3. Longevity
    By sniff in forum Male Fragrance Discussion
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 14th March 2007, 03:17 AM
  4. Okay, how about longevity..
    By Not_sosoes in forum Male Fragrance Discussion
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 30th September 2006, 07:26 AM
  5. Oil & Longevity
    By Sri in forum Just Starting Out
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 1st June 2006, 04:21 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  



Loving perfume on the Internet since 2000