Paco Rabanne is good but Azzaro is better.
Paco Rabanne PH
Battle of the 70's! Beegees VS boney M lol , Paco Rabanne PH vs Azzaro PH!!!
which one is THE best!!!
PS: which one will suit a guy in his 20's more ...
Paco Rabanne is good but Azzaro is better.
Azzaro by a lavender scented mile.
Azzaro Pour Homme is my SOTD today! good stuff
Both fine scents. My choice would be Paco Rabanne PH
I could hardly decide between the two, since both are stunning, classy, elegant and not even expensive
Both smell very dated. If you don`t want to smell like Gillette shaving foam, I would pick Azzaro.
My vote goes to Azzaro
I'm alone with my Paco vote
- Vintage Paco Rabanne
- Azzaro Pour Homme
- Current Paco Rabanne
i vote for Azzaro PH
Another vote for Azzaro pH (even though I like Paco as well).
Current Top Favorites:
1) Portrait of a Lady original formula (EdP Frédéric Malle)
2) Giorgio for Men vintage/V.I.P. for Men (Giorgio Beverly Hills)
3) Dia Man vintage edt (Amouage)
4) Anat Fritz Original Formula and Classical (Anat Fritz) - tie
4) Lalfeorosa (O'driù) - tie
6) Les Nombres d'Or Vetyver (Mona di Orio)
7) Captain vintage (Molyneux)
8) Tzora (Anat Fritz)
9) Javanese Patchouli (Zegna) - tie
9) Monsieur de Givenchy vintage (Givenchy) - tie
9) Coeur de Vetiver Sacré (L'Artisan) - tie
9) X for Men (Clive Christian) - tie
9) Patou pour Homme Privé (Jean Patou) - tie
9) Oud Shamash (The Different Company) - tie
Azzaro of course ;D
Top 10 :
1-Strictly Private Baldessarini
3-Midnight in Paris
4-Amber Sultan -- Chergui
5-Dunhill Desire -- Aigner Black
6-Seduction in Black -- La nuit de L'homme
7-Angel Schlesser oriental edition II -- J.del Puzo Arabian Nights
8-Versace PH -- Versace The Dreamer
9-Mont Blanc Individuele -- Mont Blanc Legend
10-Dirty English -- CK Shock -- CH men
i thought it will be a close combat, i see that azzaro is winning this with ease!... anyway will i smell like an OLD guy if i wear azzaro? am 26
Paco Rabanne was a defining release in men's perfumery, and the vintage stuff is mind-altering good. Azzaro followed PR, and is more complex, to my nose.
Both great but I'll always adore Paco.
ointments and perfume delight the heart....
Azzaro Pour Homme is a serious candidate for the best fragrance of all time
For your 20s, definitely Azzaro. Paco Rabanne just is a bit too mature and less versatile than Azzaro, which you can wear in most any situation. I'd be more comfortable wearing Azzaro than Paco by a longshot (I'm 26). Considering though that both can be acquired fairly cheaply, if you're a fan of both no reason why you can't have both in your collection since they're completely different scents
does azzaro have any similarity to Stetson (1981) ?
Azzaro Pour Homme
"Live in each season as it passes; breathe the air, drink the drink, taste the fruit, and resign yourself to the influences of each!" - Henry David Thoreau
here azzaro PH 100ml cost 80$ , is this price fair ?
Azzaro by a (chest) hair. Both are mature masterpieces.
Azzaro was my SOTD today, and I smelled GOOD.
Everyone is entitled to his own opinions, but not his own facts. Daniel Moynihan
Depends on where "here" is. In the US you can purchase a full bottle for ~$25, but in other countries it might be significantly more rare. To this day Azzaro PH is the only fragrance my dad will wear and prior to the internet, he would hoard bottles from whatever store he could find them in and pay a premium price because it was so difficult to find and he could never be sure when he'd be able to find it again. He still has a number of those bottles that are unopened and unused. I don't believe Azzaro PH has ever been reformulated but if so, he has a number of bottles from the mid and late 90s that could be worth something
These two are so close, I wish I could have voted "Equally great".
I give the tiny edge to Paco because it has a green smell that I love, and which Azzaro lacks.
Check out my blog Pour Monsieur, a no-nonsense guide to men's fragrances:
Any fragrance that should not be worn in public, should be worn in public.
Paco Rabanne PH shares many similarities with Azzaro PH. It's just that, IMO, Azzaro is so much better. I would basically describe Paco Rabanne as Azzaro with a greaner opening, while exihibiting a "soapiness" throughout its lifespan, a soapiness that I just don't get from Azzaro. I don't find either to be dated. Paco Rabanne is a good fragrance. However IMO, Azzaro PH is a GREAT fragrance, certainly in my top 5.
"With so many magnificent, extraordinary, smile-inducing fragrances in the world, why should I waste my time wearing and inferior one?"