Code of Conduct
Page 23 of 25 FirstFirst ... 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 LastLast
Results 661 to 690 of 731
  1. #661

    Default Re: Dior Homme Intense reformulated review.

    Quote Originally Posted by corgan View Post
    They are quite different to me.
    What do you mean? The formulas are different yes, very much so. The colour of the collars doesn't necessarily indicate which formulation you have though, because they started selling the reformulated version after they changed the bottles. There was a very brief period when people were buying old formula in new bottles is what I'm saying.

  2. #662
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    USA temporarily
    Posts
    239

    Default Re: Dior Homme Intense reformulated review.

    Quote Originally Posted by comfortablynumbbg View Post
    It's funny that despite all the panic about losing the old formulation of the fragrance and a new one coming out, at least on fragrantica the new formulation has better rating/liking than the original.
    For me it's cause the new formulation is more easy to the nose.

  3. #663

    Default Re: Dior Homme Intense reformulated review.

    Does anyone have a list of the codes which define the manufactured date? Vintage and post formulation. Itd be of great help when searching.

    Thanks!

  4. #664

    Default Re: Dior Homme Intense reformulated review.

    I was on the phone recently with a sales rep from a store nearby,

    they had 2 bottles listed as 1R01 - can anyone say for sure this is the original formula?

  5. #665

    Default Re: Dior Homme Intense reformulated review.

    Get it!! I have 1R04 and 1R05 and they are magical. Mine are from April 2011. That one is from same or earlier.
    check at: checkcosmetics.net

    where are you from, your name sounds swedish?!

  6. #666

    Default Re: Dior Homme Intense reformulated review.

    They were in fact real!




    I might have found a way to get ahold of more of these, I'll report back with my findings.
    Should I be able to grab more I'll pretty much sell for non-profit.

  7. #667

    Default Re: Dior Homme Intense reformulated review.

    I have april 2011 bottle and it is nice and strong

  8. #668

    Default Re: Dior Homme Intense reformulated review.

    cool
    still wondering if you're a swede or not.

  9. #669

    Default Re: Dior Homme Intense reformulated review.

    mine came today it's july 2011 it was a blind buy so I haven't sniff the original but I like it

  10. #670

    Default Re: Dior Homme Intense reformulated review.

    looking for a silver collar...hit me up if your looking to sell/swop

  11. #671

    Default Re: Dior Homme Intense reformulated review.

    Quote Originally Posted by Hilaire View Post
    What do you mean? The formulas are different yes, very much so. The colour of the collars doesn't necessarily indicate which formulation you have though, because they started selling the reformulated version after they changed the bottles. There was a very brief period when people were buying old formula in new bottles is what I'm saying.
    This is what I have; 4 bottles of old formula in the new style bottle (only have one silver capped 50ml and they smell the same... because they are!)

  12. #672

    Default Re: Dior Homme Intense reformulated review.

    I read this thread with great intetest! I hope i don't bore you by bumping this.

    Having said that, i guess i was lucky to find and grab two 50 ML bottles of Dior Homme Intense batch number 0Y02 (November 2010) they are still in cellophane, and i'm not willing to open them yet to check the collar color (silver or black).

    But the question is: Can i now be sure that they are the old formulation of DHI, based only to the batch code, verified at checkcosmetic.net ? As what i have learned from this thread the pre-May-2011 are vintage versions (and April-2011 is kind of tweaked version, a sort of transition version before the final reformulation.

    I'd appreciate your comments...

    By the way, today i carefully compared on my skin following versions:
    1. April 2011 1R01
    2. Some 2008 version, don't remember the batch code
    3. February 2012 version

    All from various department stores' testers.

    Number 2's cocoa and vanilla steps out much earlier and much stronger, richer than in number 1.
    Number 3, 100% surely the reformulation, really gives out the iris note much much longer, say hours. I can also smell somethin that's not in 1 and 2, i take it's the pear accord, that's in the middle notes.

    My nose is not so skilled i could say more. Will update this later today,i'll let them stay on my skin 11 hours - then i can comment the longevity.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Ok i could not hold myself i opened the other of the two 0Y02's and yes it's definately vintage- It does have a black collar though. Wearing it right now. This is so great fragrance that it's a keeper.
    "Le parfum est la musique du corps"
    (Marcel Rochas)

    Signature: Rochas Macassar (Nicolas Mamounas / Roger Pellegrino, 1980)

    Current Top 7:

    Chanel Antaeus (vtg) (Jaques Polge, 1981)
    Terre d' Hermes EDT (2006-2009) (Jean-Claude Ellena, 2006)
    Green Irish Tweed (Probably Oliver Creed / Pierre Bourdon, 1985)
    Eau de Rochas Pour Homme (Gilles Romey, 1993)
    Bleu de Chanel EDP (Jaques Polge, 2014)
    Dolce & Gabbana Pour Homme (vtg) (Max Gavary, 1994)
    Chanel Allure Homme (vtg) (Jaques Polge, 1999)

  13. #673

    Default Re: Dior Homme Intense reformulated review.

    So I just got my bottle of Feb 11 version off of a seller on ebay in Bulgaria. I have had and tried many versions of this, and let me tell you, this smells even more potent then the Dec 2010 and Nov 09 versions of this. I don't know if they do something differently in Europe, or if I just got a killer bottle of this, but none the less I only paid 80.00 USD for this, including shipping and it was well worth every single penny of it. Couldn't be more happier with this purchase. Well worth the 3 weeks it took to get here. Going to go easy on the trigger on this one, as the prices of this as everyone knows are ridiculously insane! Now I need to find another of this one and I will be set for a long time

  14. #674
    Dependent comfortablynumbbg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    1,147

    Default Re: Dior Homme Intense reformulated review.

    ^^^Good stuff, my Jan-Feb 2011 bottles are really solid on longevity, 12+ hours

  15. #675

    Default Re: Dior Homme Intense reformulated review.

    So, in your estimation, and strictly your opinion, is this close to vintage?

  16. #676
    Dependent comfortablynumbbg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    1,147

    Default Re: Dior Homme Intense reformulated review.

    They are similar but the opening of the "original" I think is less sweeter, and more herbal that's just my opinion, while the Jan-Feb 2011 stuff is sweet from the get go, and then ultimately I get a sweet pear kick to it that just seals the deal for me. Some here would say this is like sweet clay dough and I agree, but I only get that effect with the newer stuff. I get crazy good longevity with it too, 12+ hours (considering I have crazy dry skin it's a miracle, like most things disappear fast on me). I may be in a minority on basenotes (though not on fragrantica where the new stuff has arguable the best rating on the site) where I think the reformulation>original

  17. #677

    Default Re: Dior Homme Intense reformulated review.

    I don't get a pair note out of mine what so ever. To me, and only my opinion this smells identical to the Dec 2010 and Nov 2009 versions of this that I have sampled a lot. I think the pear note came much later like in Sept of 2011 or there abouts

  18. #678
    Dependent comfortablynumbbg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    1,147

    Default Re: Dior Homme Intense reformulated review.

    ^^^ I don't know but whatever "sweet fruitiness" I detect, and it does smell like what a pear smells like to me, I don't get at all with the vintage stuff. This reformulation is one of the tricky ones where even on the forums no one is entirely sure when the official change happened (some say as early as Jan-Feb 2011, some say April-May 2011, personally I have the black rings bottles from Jan-Feb 2011 and they are sweeter with a fruity note, and that's absent from my 10 ml ultra vintage sample I got from Cuddy (Fragrance Talk) quite a while back.

    the vintage juice in my sample also is like much lighter color, than the juice in my bottles

  19. #679

    Default Re: Dior Homme Intense reformulated review.

    The last month the vintage one was manufactured was April 2011.

    To my nose, the vintage is MUCH better than the "tweaked" one (starting May 2011) and the reformulated one (starting September 2011)
    "Le parfum est la musique du corps"
    (Marcel Rochas)

    Signature: Rochas Macassar (Nicolas Mamounas / Roger Pellegrino, 1980)

    Current Top 7:

    Chanel Antaeus (vtg) (Jaques Polge, 1981)
    Terre d' Hermes EDT (2006-2009) (Jean-Claude Ellena, 2006)
    Green Irish Tweed (Probably Oliver Creed / Pierre Bourdon, 1985)
    Eau de Rochas Pour Homme (Gilles Romey, 1993)
    Bleu de Chanel EDP (Jaques Polge, 2014)
    Dolce & Gabbana Pour Homme (vtg) (Max Gavary, 1994)
    Chanel Allure Homme (vtg) (Jaques Polge, 1999)

  20. #680

    Default Re: Dior Homme Intense reformulated review.

    Then for sure my Feb 11 juice is original/vintage. Whatever it is, I love it, but was just wondering. I have read what a lot of guys think of this one, with the reformulations and such. All of the samples that I have owned smell identical, but commented on how much stronger this Feb 11 smells, even in comparison to my Dec 11 and Nov 9 that I own. Starting to drive myself insane here. I think it is best for me to stay off of this page on the forum and enjoy what I have, no matter what it is. This stuff is very addicting, any way that one chooses to look at it. I have never been as obsessed with a scent as I am with this one. I have to some degree with my vintage bottles of Kouros I own, but this even out does that one!

  21. #681
    Dependent comfortablynumbbg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    1,147

    Default Re: Dior Homme Intense reformulated review.

    Lol yeah man probably is best not to wonder too much on this stuff, I also love my Jan-Feb 2011 bottles and they give me lots of potency so it's good. Agree with the addiction factor on this, something about it is just crazy

  22. #682

    Default Re: Dior Homme Intense reformulated review.

    I agree, it's addictive and a really wonderful fragrance.
    "Le parfum est la musique du corps"
    (Marcel Rochas)

    Signature: Rochas Macassar (Nicolas Mamounas / Roger Pellegrino, 1980)

    Current Top 7:

    Chanel Antaeus (vtg) (Jaques Polge, 1981)
    Terre d' Hermes EDT (2006-2009) (Jean-Claude Ellena, 2006)
    Green Irish Tweed (Probably Oliver Creed / Pierre Bourdon, 1985)
    Eau de Rochas Pour Homme (Gilles Romey, 1993)
    Bleu de Chanel EDP (Jaques Polge, 2014)
    Dolce & Gabbana Pour Homme (vtg) (Max Gavary, 1994)
    Chanel Allure Homme (vtg) (Jaques Polge, 1999)

  23. #683

    Default Re: Dior Homme Intense reformulated review.

    I was at an afternoon lunch reception yesterday that started at 11a.m. I sprayed twice before I left my house at 9a.m. At about 3 p.m. yesterday, I was approached by two women who sat a table away from where I was sitting, and as they got close to me, they both said, Who is wearing that amazing cologne? "I thought it was him" as they pointed to me. Was also asked by several others at the party of both sexes what it was, and how they could get some? My response was, "Don't even ask" unless you have a lot of time. lol This one gets noticed for sure

  24. #684

    Default Re: Dior Homme Intense reformulated review.

    I have the september 2012 batch and the longevity is actually pretty weak. I am getting about 7-8 max. Definitely not the 12+ that other people are experiencing...

  25. #685

    Default Re: Dior Homme Intense reformulated review.

    Quote Originally Posted by chinamen_6 View Post
    I have the september 2012 batch and the longevity is actually pretty weak. I am getting about 7-8 max. Definitely not the 12+ that other people are experiencing...
    7-8 max is fine to me because I work 8 hours shift so....

  26. #686

    Default Re: Dior Homme Intense reformulated review.

    The differences are not so drastic, i prefer the reformulation that lingers in this moment on my skin, more balanced, more refined with its better modulated iris, slightly less gourmandish, more masculine with its more notable virile woody/ambery aftertaste in the background. A great one.
    Currently wearing: Eight & Bob by Eight & Bob

  27. #687
    silentrich's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Fort Myers, FL
    Posts
    5,382

    Default Re: Dior Homme Intense reformulated review.

    It's been over a year since this thread was started and I just recently purchased a bottle of the newer (July 2011) version. Having just went through a 50 mL of the vintage I pretty much have a solid grasp on what it brings to the table. Still have a 100 mL bottle, which is only going to be worn on special occasions and mainly in the cooler couple of months. I actually think the newer version is better suited to warmer climates, because it isn't as dense. Quality wise, the vintage wins hands down. Not to say the newer version is junk, but it just doesn't have the same luxurious feel as the vintage. Overall, I'm very pleased with the newer version. It's versatile and true to the original. I'm a little let down though with the absence of the cocoa. I know there's something in there that makes it smell like cocoa (from a distance), but pear doesn't equal cocoa. Is the vintage worth the current market prices? God no! For what they're asking now you could buy Dior Homme, Dior Homme Sport, Dior Homme Intense (reform), and LIDGE with a few bucks left over.

  28. #688

    Default Re: Dior Homme Intense reformulated review.

    I've been wearing DHI for several years now . I have the vintage (2010) version and just picked up a July 2012 bottle. The reformulation does have several tweaks especially in the mid notes where it's a bit sweeter than the vintage. When it comes to the drydown they are pretty darn close . The reformulation definitely retains that "DHI DNA" and Dior did very well with the new version . It's also more versatile than the original. I still get excellent longevity out of the reform (9-12 hours) but it has a bit less sillage than the original. Overall still a masterpiece in my book ...

  29. #689

    Default Re: Dior Homme Intense reformulated review.

    You really have to look at WHY they HAD to change it, pretty sure it was legal reasons... they didn't own the previous formula.

    I've got both, and more vintage on the way as soon as I stop travelling. Either is fine. It's my number 1 scent so that's my only reasoning for chasing the vintage, it's more so I know I have it rather than to wear. Honestly unless you spray on your wrist and just sit all day sniffing they are so close in there intended use. Spray on and get on with your day/night and enjoy. Creeds have bigger batch variations on a shop to shop basis.
    Top 5
    1. Gucci PH2
    2. Aventus
    3. Armani Priv Rose D'arabie
    4. Creed GIT
    5. Dior Homme/Intense

    Current swap list found here ... http://tinyurl.com/9udvk8q

  30. #690

    Default Dior Homme Intense Reformulation?

    How is this one? I've never tried the original formulation but I think I would have hated the lipstick note anyway. I heard the reformulation replaces this note with a pear note. Is the reformulation still a winner?

Page 23 of 25 FirstFirst ... 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 45
    Last Post: 2nd March 2014, 04:46 AM
  2. An Intense Battle - Rive Gauche Intense vs Dior Homme Intense
    By manicboy in forum Male Fragrance Discussion
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 20th October 2012, 03:24 PM
  3. Replies: 32
    Last Post: 4th February 2011, 04:59 AM
  4. Replies: 14
    Last Post: 10th October 2010, 12:24 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  



Loving perfume on the Internet since 2000