I haven't tried the vintage but the current formulation is very good
Thread: hermes equipage
a) is it a leather?
b) how has it held up in terms of reformulations?
Only have the original and it's a real good one. I like what's out there now too.
a) Yes, I believe it is leather but a subtle leather with spice.... carnation leads the way. A definite recommendation for those that appreciate old school masculines.
b) I only know the old.
Wanna Shop? --> Buzier's Sales
MY TOP 25%: Al Oudh, Azzaro pH, Basala, Bel Ami, Black Afgano, Blackbird, Blend 30, Bull's Blood, Chaps Original, Cuba, DK Men - Fuel, Davidoff '84, Derby, Edition, Elsha 1776, Equipage, Eau d' Hermes, Egoiste Cologne Concentree, Fetish pH, Fougere Royal reissue, Genghis Khan, Green Water, Havana, Jules, Kiehl's Musk, Knize Ten, Kouros, L'Homme Sage, Leather Oud, Loewe pH, Monogram, Montecristo, Musc Ravageur, Olibanum, Perry Ellis for Men Original, Piper Nigrum, Polo, Puredistance M, Santal Noble, Santalum, Sandalo (Villoresi), Tea for Two, Tribute Attar, Ungaro II, Versace l'homme, Yatagan, YSL pH
The vintage one smells much more like a rosy scent to me. I get no leather.
belami is more leather, equipage is more fougere-fresh with just a hint blond tabacco.
Last edited by benzganesh; 26th September 2012 at 03:07 PM.
My reading of Equipage is that it is a tobacco-driven composition with a fougere-y character. Both the vintage and the current are just perfect.
Discover my Guest Reviewer Of The Day here
I only have the current formulation, so I can't speak from experience about the old; but I've heard it holds up very well.
But, no. There is absolutely no leather in Equipage. After the golden, aldehydic top-notes, it is a 'burnt tobacco pipe' impression. Avant garde in its way, for this is not literal but very cleverly impressionistic. I am certain that those who discern leather in it are mislead by their imaginations trying to make sense of the name.