Code of Conduct
Results 1 to 16 of 16
  1. #1

    Default C&S Cuba Formulations

    Does anyone know if Cuba was reformulated and if so is there a difference in the box or bottle which helps to distinguish the two?

    - - - Updated - - -

    As an addendum - any idea where to buy the vintage???

  2. #2

    Default Re: C&S Cuba Formulations

    Bump. Guys? Anyone?

    - - - Updated - - -

    Or has it even changed at all? Consensus?

  3. #3

    Default Re: C&S Cuba Formulations

    Is this the one with the cigar ?

  4. #4

  5. #5
    Super Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Liverpool
    Posts
    315

    Default Re: C&S Cuba Formulations

    I've not heard of any reformulation. And yes, it is the one with the fecal/cigar note.
    Alan

  6. #6

    Default Re: C&S Cuba Formulations

    This is one of my favs and find it remarkable. I find the references to Idole apt, yet Cuba is edgy. As to what causes the edge... perhaps some reviewers jump to a conclusion that it's an animalic (civet?), though perhaps its driven by a clove/herb/indolic floral interplay? Doesn't really matter to me.

    In any event, samples and bottles have been consistent to me. The only indication of a reformulation I've seen is in a review written here in '08 but he proceeds to tell us that he's come to this determination based off the memory of a vintage sample he'd used 2 years earlier. !!! Sorry, but I don't place any confidence in that. I surely am not going to go chasing down some phantom of a better vintage Cuba based on that. No, my two bottles look the same (I tossed the box of the one I'm working on so I cannot compare) and contain the same fine juice as far as I can tell. I don't seem to be as sensitive as others and experiences may differ.
    Simplex Sigillum Veri

  7. #7

    Default Re: C&S Cuba Formulations

    Thanks for the input.

  8. #8

    Default Re: C&S Cuba Formulations

    All the C&S fragrances were reformulated at some point. They had different packaging and everything. I don't remember the specifics, but I'm sure if you do a search on No. 88 reformulations you will find the info you're looking for.

  9. #9

    Default Re: C&S Cuba Formulations

    ^This.
    "You can ignore reality, but you can't ignore the consequences of ignoring reality." - Ayn Rand

    "I hold it that a little rebellion now and then is a good thing, and as necessary in the political world as storms in the physical...It is a medicine necessary for the sound health of government." - Thomas Jefferson

  10. #10
    vita odorifera
    perfaddict's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Lagos
    Posts
    7,472
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: C&S Cuba Formulations

    Bought Cuba when it launched in 2002, and sampled it again at the Jermyn Street shop 2 months ago. No discernible difference.
    ointments and perfume delight the heart....

    #BBOG!

  11. #11

    Default Re: C&S Cuba Formulations

    There's been discussions before on BN and the consensus seemed to be that there had been some changes/reforms over time.

  12. #12

    Default Re: C&S Cuba Formulations

    Just got my bottle today. The peppermint in the opening is, in my opinion, simply brilliant.

  13. #13

    Default

    I love Cuba.
    C&S moved manufacture from the brilliant Forester of Milan to the uk a few years back (maybe 2005???). This was a cost saving exercise and the formulae while still very good, were definitely cheapened. At that time C&S owned the formula to No.88 but not the other fragrances which were formulated by forester after they got the contract to produce 88 from John Stephen's original formula. They were reproduced by nose/specrometer without written formulae. The older formulations were sold in grey cylindrical packaging and are super rare now.

  14. #14

    Default

    Hirch, could you comment on the differences in the pre and post 2005 bottles of Cuba specifically? Cheers.

    Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2

  15. #15

    Default Re: C&S Cuba Formulations

    I realize I started this thread and that it's about Cuba - but I have compared the vintage No.88 with the newer version and despite others saying it's darker, more gothic - they really smell verrrrry close to me. I'd be curious to hear about the vintage Cuba as well.

  16. #16

    Default

    Neal, C&S actually owned the formula for 88 so they are very close, you are correct. there is less top notch sandalwood now and the rose oils are not quite what they were. But it is very close.
    Will, I have never smelled vintage Cuba unfortunately but i did smell vintage Frankincense and Myrrh and the differences in F&M are very marked. An incredible fragrance became a very good one. I didn't smell the old dark rose either but I recall reading scentemental and other good noses describing it and the newer one.
    Basically, forester of Milan are renowned for their tip top ingredients and home made floral bases. They also make DC 1913.
    Last edited by hirch_duckfinder; 20th October 2012 at 05:45 PM.

Similar Threads

  1. CUBA Black and CUBA Red are great but so many released so fast............
    By odioustoilet in forum Male Fragrance Discussion
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 5th November 2012, 09:37 PM
  2. Shead some light on Cuba Royal and Cuba Pristage?
    By scentimus in forum Male Fragrance Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 8th November 2011, 05:15 PM
  3. Havana vs. Cuba vs. Acqua di Cuba?
    By ibarney5 in forum Male Fragrance Discussion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 29th January 2009, 11:55 PM
  4. smn acqua di cuba vs. c&s cuba vs. mh feuilles de tabac?
    By ands in forum Male Fragrance Discussion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 23rd December 2008, 01:53 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •