Sometimes. Depends on the person and their taste.
Thread: Does Age Define Taste?
This question was brought up in another unrelated thread, and I was wondering what my fellow bners thought about this question? I'll start it off by saying that in my opinion age and taste are two separate things. Just because you are an old man doesn't mean you can't enjoy new fresh scents. What about young men who enjoy old classics that were worn by there fathers. I get that fragrances can give an old guy vibe but not that only old people or young people would enjoy certain scents.
Sometimes. Depends on the person and their taste.
Don't believe so.
Age does not define good taste but some people need time to learn what is tasteful.
1. Epic Man by Amouage (26 wears)
2. Leather Oud by Christian Dior (25 wears)
3. M7 by Yves Saint Laurent (20 wears)
4. Oud Imperial (black) by Perris Monte Carlo (16 wears)
5. Russian Tea Ritual by Masque (16 wears)
6. Fate Man by Amouage (14 wears)
Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind.
not for me
if it's well composed, i'll enjoy it
AUSSIES, join our exclusive niche split club.
Amouage - Tribute, Homage and OPUS VII
Andy Tauer - Noontide Petals, Miriam and Loretta
HdP - Veni, Vidi, Vici and Rosam, Ambrarem, Petroleum
The Different Company - Oud Shamash, Oud for Love and Aurore Nomade
Guerlain - Sous Le Vent, Angélique Noire, Bois d'Armenie, Cruel Gardenia, Rose Barbare
and many more niches up for split...
I believe the older we get, the more we reach for woody and heavy fragrances. Don't know why, though
One thing people severely miscalculate (regarding almost everything) is the idea that the preferences of older people today can be extrapolated to predict the preferences of people years from now. I think it's just culture. And the stuff we love now, 50 years in the future, may be old man's cologne.
I wish we had more years to observe, but before the 1900's perfume wasn't used much by common people.
I really like some scents that are described as "old-man", and I'm 30. I think that people can definitely change their preferences as they age, but I don't think that one necessarily equals the other.
When I started wearing fragrances in my teens my objective was to attract other girls and generally smell nice when on a date. I still do wear fragrances that my girlfriend enjoys while I'm around her, but I find myself wearing fragrances that I enjoy. The aspect of doing things that you enjoy for yourself isn't always there in your teenage years and it wasn't for me. Plus, it helps to have the means to purchase and experience other fragrances that I would not have been able to working a minimum wage job at 16. I'm in my late 20's now and have ever expanding tastes. However, I still can't enjoy me an "old man" scent yet...Habit Rouge had me running for the hills
Taste defines taste. Age defines age.
Absolutely not but with age (experience) your nose gets refined and taste changes automatically...
I won't say age defines taste, but it certainly does shape and guide it.
It's not solely some change in 'maturity', but also environmental factors like our friends, our disposable income and our occupations that affect what we like or buy.
I think what Duver wrote in your other thread 'Must Try !' is right on the money:
Basenotes would not exist if we all had all fragrances available at the store round the corner. We would just smell them for ourselves and wouldn't need to ask anything about it on the internet, so all background* counts when you read a review!
* how many fragrances I've smelled before
* weather of where I live
... not that all of these are easily spotted, but they matter when I interprete (not discount) someone's reviews
Context is essential when reading things so subjective as fragrance reviews.
I live in a location with a pretty average selection of fragrances, so blind buying is not uncommon to me. I know the notes and accords I like, and those I don't, but I do enjoy stepping outside the comfort zone every so often.
If I didn't find a few like-minded members whose opinions I value more highly than (but not to the exclusion of) others, I'd have a sh*tload more than 160 bottles, many of which wouldn't be often worn.
As it stands I use the guidance and opinions of those whose tastes largely match mine, and I can make relatively informed decisions.
My all time favorite:
All I can say is that when I was younger my tastes tended more towards the sweet, in fragrance as well as food. There was a time where I drank Coke as my main beverage, but now I drink mainly water and love it. I ate candy daily, and now the phrase "too sweet" has made its way in to my vocabulary. There was a time when Guerlain's Vetiver was the definition of "old man" fragrance, and now I can't wait until it gets a little warmer so I can rock it with abandon.
I can't speak for anyone but myself, but I guess my tastes have "matured" over the years.
I still don't care for Habit Rouge, Givenchy Gentleman, Caron Pour un Homme, Sung Homme and Aramis, but I'm open to the fact that some day I might.
Last edited by Nanook; 23rd April 2013 at 07:34 AM.
Please check out the bottles and samples in my swap list.
Its like a stereotype.
If you do what you want, when you want,
No barrier could defy you.
For example, at age 55 you will have smelled, worn, and lived with many more fragrances than you would have at age 25. Your knowledge of fragrances and your own preferences will be much greater later in life (assuming that your interest in fragrance continues), which would change your taste over time.
I believe that in general taste improves with age. Your frame of reference changes because of increased experience and knowledge. Choosing fragrances you like out of a small pool based on limited knowledge and testing cannot compare with the same process based on a lifetime of wearing and thinking about a much greater number of fragrances.
Judging from the diverse range of fragrances that I like, I could'nt say that taste was age specific, in my case at least. Nor do I take particular note of BNs of a specific age group.
Current Top Favorites:
1) Portrait of a Lady original formula (EdP Frédéric Malle)
2) Giorgio for Men vintage/V.I.P. for Men (Giorgio Beverly Hills)
3) Dia Man vintage edt (Amouage)
4) Anat Fritz Original Formula and Classical (Anat Fritz) - tie
4) Lalfeorosa (O'driù) - tie
6) Les Nombres d'Or Vetyver (Mona di Orio)
7) Captain vintage (Molyneux)
8) Tzora (Anat Fritz)
9) Javanese Patchouli (Zegna) - tie
9) Monsieur de Givenchy vintage (Givenchy) - tie
9) Coeur de Vetiver Sacré (L'Artisan) - tie
9) Polo vintage (Ralph Lauren) - tie
9) Patou pour Homme Privé (Jean Patou) - tie
9) Oud Shamash (The Different Company) - tie
In my case, no. My tastes were always a bit anachronistic: I have worn powerhouse fragrances since I was 14 and started to wear gourmands only in my mid to late twenties.
Probably not more than other things, e.g. fashion (of one's age), environment, class, etc.
I ve read the older people get the more they like chypre perfumes:-) , can not remember where i read this....
So i am still young lol
For me, I think part of the issue is that certain scents can come to be associated with certain ages based on each person's individual experiences. For example, my grandpa wore Eau Sauvage, and now whenever I wear it I feel like I'm 65 It doesn't mean that Eau Sauvage is inherently a scent for older folks, just that my personal history affects the way I'm able to view it, at least for now. Perhaps as time goes on I'll slowly begin to disassociate the Eau Sauvage with my grandpa, or I'll just eventually be old enough to feel justified in wearing it, but I think this is what a lot of people are saying when they say, "Aw, that scent smells like old man/old lady!"
I think it's especially funny/interesting to think about how my kids/grandkids will view the fragrances that were popular in my youth (and that invariably some of us will probably still choose to wear, even as old folks). "Mugler Cologne, gramps?! You smell like old soap and metal!"
Last edited by bleedredandblue; 24th April 2013 at 12:55 AM.