Code of Conduct
Page 1 of 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 LastLast
Results 1 to 30 of 217
  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    15,260
    Blog Entries
    15

    Default What puts you off about a house?

    Bond trying to trademark the word Peace..
    I believe they were trying to sue another house for using the word.

    Very snobbyish and scumbaggish to me..
    Also very lame scents from Ed Hardy consecutively..

    I am not a hater but J. LO having 20 scents-ridiculous

  2. #2
    hednic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Reside in McLean, NYC, Manuel Antonio & Búzios
    Posts
    135,682

    Default Re: What puts you off about a house?

    What puts me off about a house is when a decision is made to only release a fragrance to a limited geographic market.
    (1305)
    Remember that while it is perfectly acceptable to criticize the content of a post - criticizing the poster is not.
    Mean spirited, nasty, snide, sarcastic, hateful, and rude individuals on Basenotes don't warrant or deserve my or other Basenoters' acknowledgement or respect.

  3. #3
    Dependent danieq's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Southeastern Arizona
    Posts
    2,579

    Default Re: What puts you off about a house?

    Weird scent for the sake of being weird alone.

    And overly sexual marketing, ala Slumberhouse. I was interested in that house until I saw their websites lewd images. No thanks.

  4. #4

    Default Re: What puts you off about a house?

    Quote Originally Posted by danieq View Post
    And overly sexual marketing, ala Slumberhouse. I was interested in that house until I saw their websites lewd images. No thanks.
    I never noticed that about Slumberhouse. The store page was surprising!

    Houses that lie about their back story and sound snobbish put me off immediately. In the end though, I will still wear their scents (Creed) if I like them enough.

  5. #5
    Moderator

    Redneck Perfumisto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Spiritually, Kansas
    Posts
    14,661
    Blog Entries
    37

    Default Re: What puts you off about a house?

    Quote Originally Posted by danieq View Post
    Weird scent for the sake of being weird alone.

    And overly sexual marketing, ala Slumberhouse. I was interested in that house until I saw their websites lewd images. No thanks.
    OMG!

    I have not been following the house that closely, but cheapening the act seems VERY unlike Josh. I know that sex is a great marketing tool for perfume, but the rotisserie job - even in silhouette, was WAY too much.

    I think that a barely sexualized steampunky thing (Victorian edgy with just a hint of sex), like on the opening page, can intrigue without offending, while truthfully representing the fragrances.

    But don't be Tom Ford unless you ARE Tom Ford! Josh! Please tone it down!!!! No penises, please. Eaumahgah.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Tony T View Post
    Bond trying to trademark the word Peace..
    I believe they were trying to sue another house for using the word.

    Very snobbyish and scumbaggish to me..
    Also very lame scents from Ed Hardy consecutively..

    I am not a hater but J. LO having 20 scents-ridiculous
    Bond has learned to avoid those horrorshow PR mistakes. THANK G_D. But yeah - totally hear you.

    I like J. Lo Deseo for Men, but 20 scents at this stage is pretty ridiculous, I agree.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by hednic View Post
    What puts me off about a house is when a decision is made to only release a fragrance to a limited geographic market.
    (1305)
    This is an annoyance, for sure. I do like it when alternatives to get them exist. The Creed Boutique is a brilliant solution that way.

    I understand that fragrance houses want to leverage geography as a way to generate exclusivity without price, but it needs to be done with a safety valve, IMO. One benefit to worldwide shipping from your exclusivity point is the popularization of boutiques on an international basis. That is going to bring in the travelers. Sure, it's only available in one place, but if they ship internationally and don't hide that fact, it's a way of eliminating displeased customers in your worldwide clientele.
    * * * *

  6. #6

    Default Re: What puts you off about a house?

    Quote Originally Posted by Redneck Perfumisto View Post
    I have not been following the house that closely, but cheapening the act seems VERY unlike Josh. I know that sex is a great marketing tool for perfume, but the rotisserie job - even in silhouette, was WAY too much.

    I think that a barely sexualized steampunky thing (Victorian edgy with just a hint of sex), like on the opening page, can intrigue without offending, while truthfully representing the fragrances.
    Take a look who the photographer is -- that's far more interesting than the subject

  7. #7
    Moderator

    Redneck Perfumisto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Spiritually, Kansas
    Posts
    14,661
    Blog Entries
    37

    Default Re: What puts you off about a house?

    Quote Originally Posted by deadidol View Post
    Take a look who the photographer is -- that's far more interesting than the subject
    WTF :1/0smiley:

    Speechless.

    - - - Updated - - -

    I gotta go to bed. With that, g'nite!

    [And one more favor, G_d. Please don't let fragrance be taken over by Wikileaks, the CIA, NSA, military, communists, or North Korea. Maybe Creed. Not so sure about Bond no.9. Amen.]
    * * * *

  8. #8
    Basenotes Plus

    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    13,393

    Default Re: What puts you off about a house?

    Quote Originally Posted by deadidol View Post
    Take a look who the photographer is -- that's far more interesting than the subject
    Thanks for the first smile of the day

  9. #9

    Default Re: What puts you off about a house?

    Wow that Slumberhouse.

    Its quirky and fun when Etat Libre d'Orange do it the way they do it (no pun intended) but that rotisserie on slumberhouse.com ....

    What puts me off about perfume houses is only offering 50ml bottles.
    for swap/sale:



  10. #10
    Basenotes Plus
    JON RODGERS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Hertfordshire
    Posts
    15,397

    Default Re: What puts you off about a house?

    A combination of previous negative experience and tacky marketing - I expect little nowadays from the likes of Paco Rabanne, Calvin Klein, and Hugo Boss, apart from overtly sexual advertising campaigns promoting generally lousy products.
    Currently wearing: KL Homme by Lagerfeld

  11. #11
    Basenotes Plus

    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    13,393

    Default Re: What puts you off about a house?

    Lousy, generic (and overpriced) products for me.

  12. #12

    Default Re: What puts you off about a house?

    Weird marketing and strange smelling fragrances in a attempt to be different.

    The Blood Concept Range of fragrances are a good example of this. I mean the name and concept is just really off putting to me to say the least.

  13. #13

    Default Re: What puts you off about a house?

    Quote Originally Posted by danieq View Post
    Weird scent for the sake of being weird alone.

    And overly sexual marketing, ala Slumberhouse. I was interested in that house until I saw their websites lewd images. No thanks.
    Hi, danieq. I didn't even notice it until after I'd placed my order and went back to check. I was surprised, but not more. Personal opinion in response to yours. After much pondering, I've concluded one of society's great maladies is that it teaches us to abhor the natural functions of our bodies. Youtube was a boon in that respect. One day I happened on a video of a monkey (ahem) masturbating. I was actually quite shocked (I'm a city girl), but for me curiosity trumps all. I went into private browsing mode to avoid any chance of unwanted email and investigated. Turns out people have been posting animal sex like mad! Hysterical. In a way, it shows our determination to be free and discover truth -- if not via ourselves then other species, if necessary. I watched and learned an amazing truth. Everything humans do sexually animals do, too. Everything! Including what's on the Slumberhouse website. I already knew that animals compete to mate, like we do, form and maintain relationships and bonds, singularly and in groups. Only difference? They enjoy their bodies. No guilt, no neuroses. Just another perspective, FWIW. Like our perfume sniffs, this subject is exclusively personal opinion.

    To me, Slumberhouse is an adventurer (is it really one person?). Maybe I wouldn't put up a website like that, but I don't mind that they did.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by lpp View Post
    Lousy, generic (and overpriced) products for me.
    I have a feeling that by the time I'm done with my learning mode sniffs, I'm going to agree with you.
    Last edited by ScentFan; 8th December 2013 at 02:16 PM.

  14. #14

    Default Re: What puts you off about a house?

    Trying to avoid being put off by a house entirely, generally or exclusively, since most fragrance houses might still manage to have one (or more) redeeming feature (s), but more importantly, scent (s).

    Yet an ultimate deal breaker would probably be a combination between vacuous marketing claims, combined, at the same time, with little or no customer service, no steady quality, including in terms of ingredients and quality control, becoming more and more generic, discontinuing too much of the "good stuff" (provided, they had good fragrances in the first place) just in order to reach their profit margins with lesser quality but more non-challenging, more socially acceptable, less individuality sort of scents.

  15. #15
    New Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Manhattan
    Posts
    3

    Default Re: What puts you off about a house?

    What I find very unappealing is lack of originality and subpar materials, though I think this rings true for me outside of fragrances and into most other products I purchase.

  16. #16

    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    England
    Posts
    2,753

    Default Re: What puts you off about a house?

    Quote Originally Posted by danieq View Post

    And overly sexual marketing, ala Slumberhouse. I was interested in that house until I saw their websites lewd images. No thanks.
    Wow, hadn't seen that before - impressive! I can't really get too excited about it. I may submit the text on the 'About' page as an entry to the Poseur Alert competition, though.
    Currently wearing: Bois des Îles by Chanel

  17. #17

    Default Re: What puts you off about a house?

    @Marketmaker, welcome to BN, hope you enjoy.

    1. Jumping on the oud train, for a buck.
    2. Using sex as a marketing strategy(exception is ELDO, done with tongue firmly implanted in cheek)
    3. Extremely abstract notes. Including lighning accord, fog on rocks, blood accord and so on.
    4. The use of drug slang (China White anyone)
    5. As was noted by previous posters Blood Concept frags, and very cheap synthetic notes.
    6. Fragrances that seemed to be designed by committee(after focus groups, of course)

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Kagey View Post
    Wow, hadn't seen that before - impressive! I can't really get too excited about it. I may submit the text on the 'About' page as an entry to the Poseur Alert competition, though.
    ROTFL, thats priceless, thanks for the link.
    Yes, I'm on a martini diet. I've lost three days already

  18. #18
    Dependent Akahina's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Portland, OR
    Posts
    4,111

    Default Re: What puts you off about a house?

    Nothing really if the scents are good. I am put off by bad scents. I just have to laugh at houses that claim to use natural ingredients when we know that they use man made ingredients from a beaker like (nearly) all houses do.

    As for Slumberhouse's use of sexual imagery, I can't see the whole picture(s) on my smart phone. I guess he needs to size his background images so I can see the whole picture. But put off by it even if I could see it? No!!! As a photographer that holds Robert Mapplethorpe in the highest regard I can not imagine being put off by anything...
    Last edited by Akahina; 8th December 2013 at 04:01 PM.
    Most worn scents according to my haphazard use of the SOTD...so perhaps my favorites.
    1. Epic Man by Amouage (24 wears)
    2. Leather Oud by Christian Dior (22 wears)
    3. M7 by Yves Saint Laurent (18 wears)
    4. Oud Imperial (black) by Perris Monte Carlo (15 wears)
    5. Russian Tea Ritual by Masque (14 wears)
    6. Fate Man by Amouage (13 wears)
    7. Interlude Man by Amouage (12 wears plus)
    8. Journey Man by Amouage (12 wears)
    9. Terré d'Hermés by Hermés (12 wears)
    10. Sycomore by Channel (11 wears)


    Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind.

  19. #19

    Default Re: What puts you off about a house?

    Quote Originally Posted by ScentFan View Post
    Hi, danieq. I didn't even notice it until after I'd placed my order and went back to check. I was surprised, but not more. Personal opinion in response to yours. After much pondering, I've concluded one of society's great maladies is that it teaches us to abhor the natural functions of our bodies. Youtube was a boon in that respect. One day I happened on a video of a monkey (ahem) masturbating. I was actually quite shocked (I'm a city girl), but for me curiosity trumps all. I went into private browsing mode to avoid any chance of unwanted email and investigated. Turns out people have been posting animal sex like mad! Hysterical. In a way, it shows our determination to be free and discover truth -- if not via ourselves then other species, if necessary. I watched and learned an amazing truth. Everything humans do sexually animals do, too. Everything! Including what's on the Slumberhouse website. I already knew that animals compete to mate, like we do, form and maintain relationships and bonds, singularly and in groups. Only difference? They enjoy their bodies. No guilt, no neuroses. Just another perspective, FWIW. Like our perfume sniffs, this subject is exclusively personal opinion.

    To me, Slumberhouse is an adventurer (is it really one person?). Maybe I wouldn't put up a website like that, but I don't mind that they did.

    - - - Updated - - -



    I have a feeling that by the time I'm done with my learning mode sniffs, I'm going to agree with you.
    Yeah, it's just one person behind the scenes. And I totally agree with your take.

    The industry is overrun with sexualized images that are frankly way more offensive in their implicit gesturing of "if you wear Gucci Guilty, you too can be surrounded in naked flesh" or the quasi-rape "Unforgiveable Woman" ad that features a woman getting slammed up against a wall. The image on the SH site is from a series of photographs by a known (and highly controversial) underground artist; and like all good art, it's jarring, gets a strong reaction, and rattles some bones (like the scents). If you find Appelbaum's images disturbing, I'd steer clear of modern art galleries

    ELdO's take on mocking the largely disgraceful and offensive imagery that floods the perfume industry was equally irreverent—transformation into the art itself. That was a stroke of genius! I'm wired to think critically about mainstream advertising (because of the line of work I'm in), so 80% of commercial advertising for modern perfumery is truly despicable to me (peddling crap to an unsuspecting public)—but that's largely because I'm trained to read between the lines.

    For me, I really try to avoid writing off an entire brand (the whole Herbert Spencer "contempt prior to investigation" thing), but there are some lines who know exactly who their audience is and I'm simply not it (Bond, Creed etc,) But the faux-luxury / finer things in life approach will always be a turn off to me as I'm an art-nerd at heart who finds gross displays of materialism and wealth to be off-putting.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by Akahina View Post
    As a photographer that holds Robert Mapplethorpe in the highest regard I can not imagine being put off by anything...
    I've taught Mapplethorpe before, and what tends to happen is that people are initially aghast by some of the images, but are able to recognize their aesthetic qualities. Then they get used to what they see in them and don't find them nearly as troubling. Then they question why they were even shocked in the first place by what are simple images of the human body (and its limits). And then they become furious when it dawns on them that they've been conditioned by some puritan mindset that's imposed upon them and operates outside of their own moral structure. Mapplethorpe's highly instructive in this sense.

    Lobb would be the first to tell he you that he largely rejects the perfume industry and what it stands for, and that what he does is aesthetic, sensory art, pure and simple. He has little interest in making scents for "smelling nice" or "getting stuff" and is mainly out to cause strong aesthetic reactions. I only wish there were far more people in the industry with these convictions (although there are certainly some -- I'm looking at you, O'Driù).
    Last edited by deadidol; 8th December 2013 at 06:02 PM.

  20. #20
    Dependent Trilby Lark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Orange County, CA
    Posts
    1,528

    Default Re: What puts you off about a house?

    If I purchase one scent that is hard to wear, I am reluctant to try another from the same house. I am ambivalent about Chergui, so I'm avoiding Lutens for now. I know I might be missing out...
    Currently wearing: Mitsouko by Guerlain

  21. #21
    Basenotes Plus
    601red's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Ft. Myers
    Posts
    787

    Default Re: What puts you off about a house?

    Quote Originally Posted by lpp View Post
    Lousy, generic (and overpriced) products for me.
    Me too.

  22. #22

    Default Re: What puts you off about a house?

    Quote Originally Posted by Trilby Lark View Post
    If I purchase one scent that is hard to wear, I am reluctant to try another from the same house. I am ambivalent about Chergui, so I'm avoiding Lutens for now. I know I might be missing out...
    Chergui, while not a bad scent, is one of the worst examples of what Lutens offers. But if that's hard to wear for you, then yes, that line might be tricky as Chergui is probably one of the safer ones.

  23. #23

    Default Re: What puts you off about a house?

    For some strange reason, the Slumberhouse graphic doesn't bother me (although I question why they'd choose to use it) but Tom Ford's advertising and attitude is a different story:

    http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/03/fa...ml?ref=tomford
    http://www.bellasugar.com/Love-Hate-...ampaign-626923
    https://www.google.com/search?q=sexi...w=1024&bih=610
    Currently wearing: The Wendol by Blackbird

  24. #24
    Basenotes Institution sjg3839's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    22,727

    Default Re: What puts you off about a house?

    Prices and wack flankers.

  25. #25
    Basenotes Junkie Curly11's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    787

    Default Re: What puts you off about a house?

    I just looked at the Slumberhouse website, but since I do most browsing on my iPad I didn't see much that was terribly lewd. Maybe I need to use my laptop. I thought that all the images appeared quite professional, and my guess is that Josh is making money at his business and can afford to upgrade the appearance of his website. A perfume company that uses lewd, or maybe I should say "common" images is House of Sillage. Last summer I was looking into their website and was turned off by the greased-up, uber-busty babes, and pretty beefcake that were used for advertising. One image suggested a bondage situation. I didn't like that, but I do absolutely enjoy wearing Emerald Reign. I dunno. At least Slumberhouse went for something interesting and sort of unusual to promote the product. Edwardian and Steampunk imagery is very appealing to me so there you have it.

  26. #26
    Moderator

    Redneck Perfumisto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Spiritually, Kansas
    Posts
    14,661
    Blog Entries
    37

    Default Re: What puts you off about a house?

    Quote Originally Posted by hedonist222 View Post
    What puts me off about perfume houses is only offering 50ml bottles.
    That can be VERY annoying. When I fall hard for a scent, I want enough to spray, decant to atomizers, and trade with abandon. If it's only in a small size, it had better be strong stuff, or a high concentration.

    Quote Originally Posted by JON RODGERS View Post
    A combination of previous negative experience and tacky marketing - I expect little nowadays from the likes of Paco Rabanne, Calvin Klein, and Hugo Boss, apart from overtly sexual advertising campaigns promoting generally lousy products.
    There are so many "disposable" fragrances out there now. I tend to dispose before I purchase.

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack Hunter View Post
    Weird marketing and strange smelling fragrances in a attempt to be different.

    The Blood Concept Range of fragrances are a good example of this. I mean the name and concept is just really off putting to me to say the least.
    Yes - difference for its own sake is pretty easy - being different and actually saying something is hard. I'm glad that fragrance has some players who do the blatantly different stuff, but my interest is more likely to fall on somebody with a more subtle and thoughtful difference, and a more worked-out expression of the idea

    Quote Originally Posted by marketmaker View Post
    What I find very unappealing is lack of originality and subpar materials, though I think this rings true for me outside of fragrances and into most other products I purchase.
    Sub-par materials are creeping into even some of the best and most talent-driven fragrances. I hesitate to name names, because if people aren't noticing, I don't want to spoil their pleasure. But the palette is in trouble, and technology falters in keeping up with the rules. The artists are not being listened to, either.

    Quote Originally Posted by trex57 View Post
    @Marketmaker, welcome to BN, hope you enjoy.

    1. Jumping on the oud train, for a buck.
    2. Using sex as a marketing strategy(exception is ELDO, done with tongue firmly implanted in cheek)
    3. Extremely abstract notes. Including lighning accord, fog on rocks, blood accord and so on.
    4. The use of drug slang (China White anyone)
    5. As was noted by previous posters Blood Concept frags, and very cheap synthetic notes.
    6. Fragrances that seemed to be designed by committee(after focus groups, of course)

    - - - Updated - - -



    ROTFL, thats priceless, thanks for the link.
    Oud train - I hear you.

    I enjoy the message as part of the whole fragrance, so sexual aspects to marketing not only don't bother me - I like them. But I appreciate subtlety, class, and truth in the fluffing of the brand.

    To me, fragrance is not just art - at least not 7 days of the week. I have my art days, and on other days, I just want to smell good. But fragrance is also about smelling good to other people, and not always for no reason. I want to enjoy the whole package, and cheat myself out of none of it. So in a bizarre way, even though I have no real need for the Acqua di Gio models with six-pack abs, they are a necessary part of something greater, which I accept in its totality just because it's wonderful that such things exist. Not sure that makes sense. Maybe it's just the music in Starbucks that's making me feel this way.

    Yeah, the "literary" notes. I'm waiting for "dark and stormy oud".

    Focus group fragrances, for sure. Or even if it's something else, the lack of smart purpose. Take Bleu de Chanel. There is no way that the idea for it came out of Polge's head as "Let's make a huge mainstream fragrance today." He surely got some kind of direction. And if that purpose came from a bunch of marketroids after listening to a bunch of focus groups, I would not be surprised at all. But Polge clearly knew how to pull a rabbit out of the hat, and make something salable to American males, that he could be proud of, even when tasked with "make something that competes directly with everything else in Macy's".

    Then compare to Lady Gaga's scent. Damn. There are a gazillion ways that could have come out better on the fragrance end. Bottle? Perfect. Black disappearing fluid? Genius. Scent? I smell too many chefs spoiling that broth. This is one that screamed for Gaga, perfumer, and some artistic director in a room, and everybody accepts what comes out, no matter what.

    Quote Originally Posted by deadidol View Post
    ... If you find Appelbaum's images disturbing, I'd steer clear of modern art galleries
    Really, I don't think that's fair. Quite thankfully, the modern art world is not one big Mapplethorpe exhibit.

    Quote Originally Posted by deadidol View Post
    For me, I really try to avoid writing off an entire brand (the whole Herbert Spencer "contempt prior to investigation" thing), but there are some lines who know exactly who their audience is and I'm simply not it (Bond, Creed etc,) But the faux-luxury / finer things in life approach will always be a turn off to me as I'm an art-nerd at heart who finds gross displays of materialism and wealth to be off-putting.
    I agree - it's important not to write anybody off, but when it takes effort, sometimes one just has to pick and choose. There are literally hundreds of house choices, and thousands of fragrances.

    Luxury doesn't really work for me, except as a certain implication of quality (which experience may send crashing to the ground in a single sniff). I do enjoy a certain amount of house self-fluffing, though, just for its association with fragrance history.


    Quote Originally Posted by deadidol View Post
    I've taught Mapplethorpe before, and what tends to happen is that people are initially aghast by some of the images, but are able to recognize their aesthetic qualities. Then they get used to what they see in them and don't find them nearly as troubling. Then they question why they were even shocked in the first place by what are simple images of the human body (and its limits). And then they become furious when it dawns on them that they've been conditioned by some puritan mindset that's imposed upon them and operates outside of their own moral structure. Mapplethorpe's highly instructive in this sense.
    I have to deal more with my self-imposed puritanism. But to get there, I did have to get rid of the previous installation, and then consider the alternatives.


    Quote Originally Posted by deadidol View Post
    Lobb would be the first to tell he you that he largely rejects the perfume industry and what it stands for, and that what he does is aesthetic, sensory art, pure and simple. He has little interest in making scents for "smelling nice" or "getting stuff" and is mainly out to cause strong aesthetic reactions. I only wish there were far more people in the industry with these convictions (although there are certainly some -- I'm looking at you, O'Driù).
    In that sense, then I agree that his graphics do make some kind of sense. I just think that, on first inspection, the sexuality appears to be less considered, and more like a bad imitation of what everybody else does. Maybe I'm just not a true Slumberhouseperson!

    Quote Originally Posted by socalwoman View Post
    For some strange reason, the Slumberhouse graphic doesn't bother me (although I question why they'd choose to use it) but Tom Ford's advertising and attitude is a different story:

    http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/03/fa...ml?ref=tomford
    http://www.bellasugar.com/Love-Hate-...ampaign-626923
    https://www.google.com/search?q=sexi...w=1024&bih=610
    I have never figured out why he does what he does with women in his ads. Sometimes it seems brilliant (like in some of his glasses ads), but other times, it just seems that he manipulates the women like mannequins, and perhaps that's the whole problem.
    * * * *

  27. #27

    Default Re: What puts you off about a house?

    Quote Originally Posted by Redneck Perfumisto View Post
    Really, I don't think that's fair. Quite thankfully, the modern art world is not one big Mapplethorpe exhibit.
    I apologize; I didn't mean for that to come across as snarky. I work in the arts, so "difficult" art rarely surprises me any more. But a recent visit to MOMA gave me a bit of a run for my money with a couple of their temporary installations

    Anyhow, back on topic -- sorry for the derailment!

  28. #28
    Moderator

    Redneck Perfumisto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Spiritually, Kansas
    Posts
    14,661
    Blog Entries
    37

    Default Re: What puts you off about a house?

    Quote Originally Posted by deadidol View Post
    I apologize; I didn't mean for that to come across as snarky. I work in the arts, so "difficult" art rarely surprises me any more. But a recent visit to MOMA gave me a bit of a run for my money with a couple of their temporary installations

    Anyhow, back on topic -- sorry for the derailment!
    No problem - and thanks! I will admit that the last really good modern art exhibit I saw was in Texas, and - well - everything good, but nothing difficult.
    * * * *

  29. #29
    Dependent danieq's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Southeastern Arizona
    Posts
    2,579

    Default Re: What puts you off about a house?

    Quote Originally Posted by ScentFan View Post
    Hi, danieq. I didn't even notice it until after I'd placed my order and went back to check. I was surprised, but not more. Personal opinion in response to yours. After much pondering, I've concluded one of society's great maladies is that it teaches us to abhor the natural functions of our bodies. Youtube was a boon in that respect. One day I happened on a video of a monkey (ahem) masturbating. I was actually quite shocked (I'm a city girl), but for me curiosity trumps all. I went into private browsing mode to avoid any chance of unwanted email and investigated. Turns out people have been posting animal sex like mad! Hysterical. In a way, it shows our determination to be free and discover truth -- if not via ourselves then other species, if necessary. I watched and learned an amazing truth. Everything humans do sexually animals do, too. Everything! Including what's on the Slumberhouse website. I already knew that animals compete to mate, like we do, form and maintain relationships and bonds, singularly and in groups. Only difference? They enjoy their bodies. No guilt, no neuroses. Just another perspective, FWIW. Like our perfume sniffs, this subject is exclusively personal opinion.

    To me, Slumberhouse is an adventurer (is it really one person?). Maybe I wouldn't put up a website like that, but I don't mind that they did.

    - - - Updated - - -





    I have a feeling that by the time I'm done with my learning mode sniffs, I'm going to agree with you.
    It wasn't the photography so much as the graphics which I felt crossed the line. The photography is quite striking and while I may not have chosen it, I didn't take issue with it. I don't think of human beings as animals, though I realize that is a less popular opinion at present, and I don't agree personally that all of the things our human bodies do 'naturally' are suitable for advertising. In particular as there is such a tremendous amount of sexual exploitation that takes place around the globe (think about the billion dollar sex trade where children are kidnapped and sold into sexual slavery) it seems irresponsible to use these types of images knowing that such images lead to sexual exploitation more often then most people ever consider. The stats are quite alarming on human trafficking but most people are completely uniformed.

    I suppose you can call anything you want art but giving it such a label doesn't really make it untouchable in my opinion, nor does it make it good. Why use something that may alienate anyway? Are there no other original ideas available that lewdness becomes the only viable option?


    Quote Originally Posted by socalwoman View Post
    For some strange reason, the Slumberhouse graphic doesn't bother me (although I question why they'd choose to use it) but Tom Ford's advertising and attitude is a different story:

    http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/03/fa...ml?ref=tomford
    http://www.bellasugar.com/Love-Hate-...ampaign-626923
    https://www.google.com/search?q=sexi...w=1024&bih=610
    Wow! I had no idea TF used such images. Not a fan of that either. But, as has been pointed out, many houses, probably most, use sex as that seems to be what sells.

  30. #30
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    302
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: What puts you off about a house?

    dumb names to get people's attention: breath of god, french lover, and fat electrician

Similar Threads

  1. the scent which really puts a spell on people!
    By Francolino in forum Male Fragrance Discussion
    Replies: 43
    Last Post: 24th September 2012, 10:33 AM
  2. Article: Bond No.9 Puts Andy Warhol Back In The Spotlight
    By Lila Das Gupta in forum Article Comments
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 22nd November 2011, 04:14 PM
  3. Who puts the chewy in patchouli?
    By Jardanel in forum Male Fragrance Discussion
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 18th September 2009, 04:03 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  



Loving perfume on the Internet since 2000