Code of Conduct
Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1

    Default Article about styrene

    This article was mentioned on MUA this morning and I thought it may also be of interest to BNers.

    http://www.ewg.org/enviroblog/2014/0...n-cause-cancer

    It discusses styrene, an ingredient used in things like foam cups and perfume. The article references a National Academy of Sciences report last month that supposedly indicates styrene is a carcinogenic.
    Last edited by socalwoman; 11th August 2014 at 04:47 PM.

  2. #2

    Default Re: Article about styrene

    Thanks for the info.

  3. #3
    hednic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    McLean, NYC, & Búzios
    Posts
    83,666

    Default Re: Article about styrene

    Had read about a similar finding in another source. Alarming.
    Remember that while it is perfectly acceptable to criticize the content of a post - criticizing the poster is not.
    Mean spirited, nasty, snide, sarcastic, hateful, and rude individuals don't warrant or deserve other individuals' acknowledgement or respect.

  4. #4

    Default Re: Article about styrene

    Yikes. Thanks for letting us know.

  5. #5
    DON'T DRINK AND DRESS

    kbe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    The Big Blue Marble
    Posts
    18,371
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: Article about styrene

    This Wall Street Journal article indicates there is plausible opposition to the possibility small exposure events to styrene can cause human cancers:

    http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/...09690674342508
    'Those who grow too big for their pants will be exposed in the end'--anon

  6. #6

    Default Re: Article about styrene

    Quote Originally Posted by kbe View Post
    This Wall Street Journal article indicates there is plausible opposition to the possibility small exposure events to styrene can cause human cancers:

    http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/...09690674342508
    I wish I could read it, but I'm not a WSJ subscriber so it won't let me. I see it was published in November, prior to the study published July 12 by The National Academies Press. I'll post their press release below:


    News from the National Academies

    Styrene Reasonably Anticipated to Be a Human Carcinogen, New Report Confirms



    A new report from the National Research Council has upheld the listing of styrene as “reasonably anticipated to be a human carcinogen” in the National Toxicology Program’s 12th Report on Carcinogens (RoC). The committee that wrote the report found that the listing is supported by “limited but credible” evidence of carcinogenicity in human studies, “sufficient” evidence from animal studies, and “convincing relevant information” in mechanistic studies that observed DNA damage in human cells that had been exposed to styrene. The committee reached the same conclusion after conducting both a peer review of the RoC and an independent assessment of the styrene literature.



    The NTP is an interagency program that produces the RoC. Styrene is a substance of interest for the RoC because many people in the United States are exposed. It is an oily, colorless to yellow liquid and it is found in many consumer products such as plastic packaging, food containers, and household goods. Sources of environmental exposure include cigarette smoke and vehicle exhaust. Occupational exposure can occur during the industrial processing of styrene.



    Based on RoC listing criteria, a substance can be classified as reasonably anticipated to be a human carcinogen based on sufficient evidence in animals or limited evidence in human studies. In its peer review of the 12th RoC, the committee examined the primary literature cited in the document as well as other research published before June 10, 2011, and found that the RoC identified the most important studies and described the limitations and strengths of each, and that the arguments supported listing styrene as reasonably anticipated to be a human carcinogen.



    In its independent assessment, the committee considered additional research published through Nov. 13, 2013. It found that “compelling evidence” exists in human, animal, and mechanistic studies to support listing styrene, at a minimum, as reasonably anticipated to be a human carcinogen.



    The committee noted, however, that there was ambiguity with respect to weighing the mechanistic evidence when applying the listing criteria, and that a strong argument could be made to support the listing of styrene as a known human carcinogen if data derived from the study of human tissues or cells alone were considered sufficient. Further clarification and expanded guidance by the National Toxicology Program regarding the types and strength of mechanistic evidence and how it is used in the context of the RoC listing criteria is needed, the report says.



    DETAILS:

    Review of the Styrene Assessment in the National Toxicology Program 12th Report on Carcinogens is available for immediate release at http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=18725. Media inquiries should be directed to the Office of News and Public Information; tel. 202-334-2138 or e-mail news@nas.edu.


    I have lots of questions. What would my favorite scents smell like if they were reissued without styrene? What will IFRA and EU do about it? What are "safe" levels and how is that best determined? Was I causing more harm to myself than I thought when I ate take-out food from the local hole-in-the-wall that has those delicious burritos?

  7. #7

    Default Re: Article about styrene

    Another ill informed article full of half truths designed to cause panic amongst the gullible. As it is quite clear that the author of this article knows little of the subject I shall ignore it.

  8. #8

    Default Re: Article about styrene

    Wow, if I live to be 1,000 years old I think this will begin to frighten me! LOL.

  9. #9
    Basenotes Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    23

    Default Re: Article about styrene

    The article goes from “reasonably anticipated to be a human carcinogen” to “compelling evidence”.

    It then goes on to say this: "The committee noted, however, that there was ambiguity with respect to weighing the mechanistic evidence when applying the listing criteria".

    Bahhh!!!

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 8
    Last Post: 21st December 2012, 11:29 AM
  2. Replies: 29
    Last Post: 1st October 2012, 04:38 PM
  3. Article: Non-IFRA-compliant fragrance on the market
    By Grant Osborne in forum Article Comments
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 26th February 2012, 04:57 AM
  4. IFRA article in Wired magazine
    By Persolaise in forum General Fragrance Discussion
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 26th October 2011, 05:36 PM
  5. Article Pokes fun at IFRA
    By Natural_Juice in forum Male Fragrance Discussion
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 23rd July 2010, 06:27 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  



Loving perfume on the Internet since 2000