
Originally Posted by
Bill Roberts
Perception is a very interesting subject and the more (it's not been any tremendous amount to date) I get experience with seeking useful feedback from people who might be typical of users, the more it seems that limiting to whether they like something and how much, or do you prefer this to that, is nearly all that ends up being reliable. Asking about how much that a named note seems present seems to miss more than hit.
Related to that, as an example I have read so many comments on Paco Rabanne Pour Homme where people call it green, so that must be common, but I don't perceive green at all.
if I tried to make a planned homage to it "green to me" because of reading all those impressions of green I could be going 180 degrees in the wrong direction.
Or in my game entry, a judge called it spicy, but I sense none and wouldn't even know what material could have given that. No eugenol in there or anything like that. I'm truly clueless, but I am sure he perceived as he did and maybe his terminology would be the more common one than mine. Do I sense the note he did? Maybe, but if so I give it a different name and I don't even know what that would be.
But if it came at as enjoyed and well-balanced, then that is what matters even if somehow there is this communications (or actual perception?) gap.
A bit of an aside, but the intended relevance was, if it doesn't smell where it's making the perfume better to you and others -- whether called green or not -- then it's not useful, whether green or not, while if the reverse is true, then it is.
We need the terminology but also sometimes between particular people it doesn't sync up.